H.B. 216 Child Support Calculation Amendments

What this bill does

The bill would remove the current exclusion of Social Security Disability Insurance from the income a court may consider when calculating child support. Courts would be allowed, but not required, to count those benefits as income.

Plain-English summary written by AI from the sponsor’s presentation in committee and on the floor. Check the official text below.

Your legislators on this bill

Enter your address to see what your own representative and senator did on this bill.

Quotes come from the official recordings' automatic captions, which can mishear words. Speakers and summaries are identified by AI and can be wrong. Use the ▶ links to check the recording.

Take action

This bill's session is over, but your legislators still want to hear from you. Ideas that died often come back next year.

Enter your address to get your legislators' contact information and a ready-to-send message about this bill.

Every vote

• 9 yes, 0 no, 2 absentHouse Judiciary Committee: vote to approve it · Feb 13, 2026Who voted how
• 68 yes, 0 no, 7 absentFinal House vote · Feb 23, 2026Who voted how
• 5 yes, 0 no, 4 absentSenate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee: vote to approve it · Feb 27, 2026Who voted how

Hearings and debates

• Feb 13, 2026 House Judiciary Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (12 turns)

  1. Committee chair (presiding)58:07

     All right. We'll move on to item three. HB two 16, child support calculation amendments. Representative Toucher, welcome back.

  2. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher58:28

     Thank you, Madam Chair, members of the committee. Um, I do have a flyer that my intern has. Do you mind if she passes that out, please? All right. Well, um, earlier this year, I had a constituent reach out and, um, she, uh, had recently been divorced and, uh, explained to me that, uh, as they were going through, uh, the decision of child support, um, you know, she was on a, a fairly limited income, um, her husband, uh, qualified for Social Security Disability insurance, and, um, was that made up the majority of his income. And, uh, under Utah Code, I didn't realize this at the time, but we exclude Social Security Disability insurance from being, uh, imputed his income, uh, when calculating child support. And so, in essence, uh, in this situation, her husband showed that he had zero income, she had a modest income, but she now showed that she had to pay child support even though the income that he was receiving from the Social Security disability insurance was significantly more than she was making. Uh, and so we, uh, started to look into this to see why, why this is fair, you know, why would you exclude this? And what I found is that, um, in, in Utah's law, we exclude both social security, uh, in, uh, so supplemental Social Security Income, SSI and Social Security Disability income from Gross Income, one, calculating child support. But we're actually the only state that excludes the Social Security disability insurance, uh, from a parent income, from, from calculating child support. And, uh, as, as Utah is an outlier. Part of the reason is, is that the Social Security disability insurance is compared to SSI, which is really need space, it's meant to just cover the basic necessities. Um, it's, it's based on those that have low income. Uh, alternatively, uh, SSDI is an insurance program that when you work, you pay into it. And if you become disabled, then it is meant to replace your wages. Um, and so those payments are typically higher than what you would see from SSI. Um, and so in, in looking at this and seeing that Utah is an outlier, um, I'm proposing today HB two 16, which as you can see, is a very simple bill. It just excludes the, um, or includes the SSDI when calculating social security, or, excuse me, child support, um, uh, calculations. Now, I, I think it's important to note that, uh, this bill does still preserve judicial discretion in making those child support decisions. So the court doesn't have to include this, but it is on the list of items that they can include when calculating child support. So, with that Madam Speaker, I think this is fair, um, when calculating that to make sure the court has all of the information when making that determination. And I'd be happy to answer any questions from the committee. Thank you. Back to the committee for discussion or clarifying questions.

  3. Committee chair (presiding)1:01:35

     Seeing none will go to the public for comment. Does anyone here wish to speak to this? Please come forward. You'll have two minutes. Please state your name and who you represent. Welcome.

  4. Charles Edwin Shipp, resident1:01:52

     Thank you. Charles Edwin Ship. I represent myself and my wife. I just wanna say this is really common sense and we commend you, Jordan, for taking the emphasis on this. Amen.

  5. Committee chair (presiding)1:02:09

     Thank you. Is there anyone? Thank you. Alright, well, we'll come back to the committee for Potential Action Representative Thompson.

  6. Rep. Jason E. Thompson1:02:22

     Thank you, Madam Chair. Um, I'd like to do, there's no subs or amendments need to be adopted, is that correct?

  7. Committee chair (presiding)1:02:28

     That's correct. Okay.

  8. Rep. Jason E. Thompson1:02:29

     Um, I'd like to move that we favorably recommend HB two 16 with a favorable recommendation.

  9. Committee chair (presiding)1:02:36

     The motion is to favorably recommend HB two 16. Would you like to

  10. Rep. Jason E. Thompson1:02:40

      Speak to that? Yeah, I will. Just briefly. Yeah, it, it does seem like it's common sense. Um, you know, you, you think, um, you know, there is a responsibility in child support to, um, make sure that the financial needs, um, of children and, um, uh, the other parent are, are met. Um, this seems like common sense. I don't know why it hasn't been done before. And, uh, I commend the sponsor for, for his work here. So yeah, I support it.

  11. Committee chair (presiding)1:03:11

      Wonderful. Thank you to the sponsor. I'll wave. Thank you. Okay,

  12. Committee chair (presiding)1:03:15

      We'll do a roll call vote. Representative Abbott Acton. Aye. Axio gracious. It's never around. We'll move on. Hawkins. Heck yeah. Lube. Yes. Millard? Yes. Thompson, I guess. Heck yeah. Clancy. Yes. And Libe. Aye, that passes unanimously. Thank you for being here. Thank you. I'm gonna turn the gavel over to Representative Clancy and go down to the there.

• Feb 23, 2026 House floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (13 turns)

  1. Speaker (presiding)1:02:01

     House Bill two 16 Child support calculation amendments by Representative Teuscher. This bill was heard in judiciary with a vote of 9 0 2 Representative Teuscher.

  2. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher1:02:12

     Thank you Mr. Speaker. Um, colleagues, um, when calculating child support, there are a number of different, um, uh, measures that the court can use to impute income to one or the other spouses. One of the, uh, areas that is currently excluded is, um, social Security disability insurance. Now, social security disability insurance is a program, it's an insurance program for individuals who have worked and paid social security taxes and then have a severe long-term disability. It is meant to replace their long-term wages. Um, and those typic are a lot. Hi. Those payments are typically a lot higher than what you see for supplemental security income. SSI, which is also excluded. So recently I had a, uh, a constituent reach out that, um, was making a, you know, small kind of meager minimum wage like salary. And, um, her ex-husband had, uh, received receives this Social security disability, uh, insurance. And because it's not imputed in any way, though, he was receiving a much higher amount of money each month, she owed him child support. It didn't make sense, wasn't equitable. So we started to look to see, well, how do other states treat this type of income? And we found that Utah was the only state that excludes SSDI in child support calculations. And so this bill, HB two 16 is a very simple bill. It simply switches that back, allows for the court to consider that when imputing income, again, it, it is at the court's discretion. So if there's other extenuating circumstances though, could those could be brought to the court. The court can take that into consideration. But currently under the, under the current code, they can't even consider that type of income when imputing income. And so, uh, with this, uh, it's, uh, received unanimous support. I haven't heard anyone that's, uh, opposed to this bill. I know there is a another bill that talks about how to impute income when you have an incarcerated individual and they're trying to, to determine, uh, income as well. And I think they're adding this and that bill as well. So that would be a separate bill that we'll hear, hear later. Um, but, uh, just wanted to to bring up that clarification. With that Mr. Speaker, happy to answer any questions.

  3. Speaker (presiding)1:04:27

     Thank you Representative Teuscher discussion to the bill Representative Hansen.

  4. Rep. Leah Hansen1:04:34

     Thank you Mr. Speaker. Pro Tem. Will the sponsor yield

  5. Speaker (presiding)1:04:38

     Sponsor yield to a question? Yes, go Ahead. Thank you Mr. Speaker

  6. Rep. Leah Hansen1:04:41

     Pro tem. So I just kind of wanna know what that amount would actually look like for like that social security disability insurance thing?

  7. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher1:04:53

     That's a good question and I don't know exactly how it's calculated. I can tell you what I've heard generally is, um, it, it depends on how much money you made before. So it's a percentage of the money that you made before. Um, I know in, in most kind of private areas it looks at about 60% of the income that you were making before in, in furthering that. But if you also have kids, then they add additional amounts of, um, of that insurance that comes to you. So I know in my, uh, constituents case, um, her ex-husband was getting about $6,000 a month in, uh, social Security disability insurance.

  8. Rep. Leah Hansen1:05:31

     Thank You Mr. Speaker Protime. That's crazy.

  9. Speaker (presiding)1:05:36

     Thank you Representative Hansen. Further discussion Representative Dominguez?

  10. Rep. Rosalba Dominguez1:05:41

      Yes, thank you Mr. Speaker pro tem. I rise in support of this bill. A lot of times we find, um, I have constituents as well who, whose family, um, are in need. And this said, a parent is receiving social security is abled or is fine, but, um, that then adds up to thousands of dollars, which even at a percentage to the court's discretion would be, would be greatly appreciated. So thank you to the good sponsor for bringing the bail.

  11. Speaker (presiding)1:06:16

      Thank you Representative Dominguez. Further discussion to the bill Scene none, representative Asha for summation.

  12. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher1:06:22

      I'll waive summation open on house Bill two 16. Child support calculation.

  13. Speaker (presiding)1:07:18

      Seeing all present, having voted voting will be closed house bill two 16, having received 68 yay votes and zero nay votes passes the house and will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration matter. Meeting clerk

• Feb 27, 2026 Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (8 turns)

  1. Committee chair2:07:00

     Thank you very much. Thank you. Um, is Representative Tesser here? Oh, he's here. You snuck in. I didn't see you. Yep. Alright, representative Tesser, we're gonna jump to House Bill two 16, child Support calculation amendments.

  2. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher2:07:18

     Thank you Mr. Chair. Members of the committee. This is a really simple bill. Um, currently there, um, there are two different types of, uh, very similarly named, uh, income replacement, uh, uh, benefits that come from the government. Supplemental Security income SSII and then Social Security Disability Insurance. SSDI, uh, SSI is a need space program that provides monthly payments to those that are 65 and older, blind or disabled, who have limited income and resources. Whereas SSDI is an insurance program that, uh, everyone's granted that as you pay into social security and you become disabled, then payments come to try to supplement what your income was when you become disabled. Well, for whatever reason, uh, in our code when Imputing child support, we have excluded generally SSDI. Um, and, uh, I had a constituent come to me who, uh, recently was, uh, divorced and, uh, Uintah go, uh, determine child support. And though her husband was receiving close to $6,000 a month, and she made less than that, um, when they Uintah impute the income because of the way the statute read, he showed zero income. She showed some income, and so she ended up owing child support. Um, so we started looking into this and found from the best of of our knowledge, Utah is the only state that excludes SSDI from imputing Income for child Support. And so what you see in, uh, this very simple bill house, bill two 16 is just removing that section so the court can consider Social security disability insurance when imputing income, it still is permissive. So the court, uh, could choose, uh, to not, uh, impute that income. Um, but it does allow the court now to consider that when impeding income. And that is the bill. Thank you very much.

  3. Committee chair2:09:08

     Um, any, I don't see any questions for the sponsor.

  4. Unknown speaker2:09:11speaker not certain

     Um, I have, um, well, I will tell you I have litigated this exact same issue, or I've been involved in situations with the exact same issue, with similar results to, to what you, um, described. But I didn't know that Utah was an outlier, um, uh, in terms of not counting that as income and other states did.

  5. Committee chair2:09:31

     So thank you for that. Is there anybody from the public that would like to be heard on this bill? All right. I'm going to close the public hearing and bring it back to the committee.

  6. Committee chair2:09:43

     Senator Balding.

  7. Sen. Balderree2:09:44

     Thank you. I recommend that we pass out with the favorable recommendation house Bill two 16 to the full body of the Senate.

  8. Committee chair2:09:51

     All right. We have a motion to favorably recommend the bill. Would you like to sum? I'll waive waive Senator All waive. Alright. All in favor of the motion to favorably recommend House Bill two 16 child support calculation amendments to the full body of the Senate. Say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair of that passes. Un unanimously. Five to zero. Congratulations. Thank you.