S.B. 84 Department of Commerce Amendments

What this bill does

The bill creates a Department of Commerce technology, education and training fund. Fees the department charges for bulk public records requests about business entities, which a third-party vendor previously handled, would be collected in this fund and used for department technology and training.

Plain-English summary written by AI from the official description. Check the official text below.

Your legislators on this bill

Enter your address to see what your own representative and senator did on this bill.

Quotes come from the official recordings' automatic captions, which can mishear words. Speakers and summaries are identified by AI and can be wrong. Use the ▶ links to check the recording.

Take action

This bill's session is over, but your legislators still want to hear from you. Ideas that died often come back next year.

Enter your address to get your legislators' contact information and a ready-to-send message about this bill.

Every vote

• 5 yes, 0 no, 3 absentSenate Business and Labor Committee: vote to approve it · Jan 21, 2026Who voted how
• 25 yes, 0 no, 4 absentFirst of two Senate votes · Jan 22, 2026Who voted how
• 27 yes, 0 no, 2 absentFinal Senate vote · Jan 23, 2026
• 10 yes, 0 no, 6 absentHouse Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee: vote to approve it · Feb 4, 2026Who voted how
• 61 yes, 7 no, 7 absentFinal House vote · Feb 11, 2026
• 24 yes, 0 no, 5 absentSenate vote to accept the other chamber's changes · Feb 13, 2026

Hearings and debates

• Jan 21, 2026 Senate Business and Labor Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (9 turns)

  1. Committee chair47:02

     of Commerce Amendments. Senator Vickers.

  2. Sen. Evan J. Vickers47:05

     Thank you Mr. Chair. Yeah, this is, uh, an interim bill that we worked on, you know, during, during the interim with, uh, business and labor. And we've got some representative from the Department of Commerce. With your permission, I'd like to turn some time over to him.

  3. Committee chair47:18

     That'd be great. Uh, if you identify yourself.

  4. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Utah Department of Commerce47:24

     Sure thing. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, my name is Jacob Hart. I'm a Deputy director at the Utah Department of Commerce. So this bill, uh, creates a new fund based out of, um, the, the ability of the department to go out and, um, instead of having a third party, do all of our list compiling and sales have that be directly, uh, done by the department. And so nothing in the way that lists are currently sold within the department are changing right now. The two main areas where that happens is the division of professional licensing, where we have rules around the kinds of organizations that can ask for, um, contact information, for example. Otherwise, you just get to know that the person has an appropriate license, and that's public information. And we have groups that like to ask for the list. And in the spirit of, Hey, how can we as government do things that make more sense in terms of our fiscal responsibility. Um, right now that money's just being, um, it's being taken by a third party that's selling these lists, rather than having that roll back into services and technology for the fee payers that actually pay for those lists. So that's the idea behind the bill. The other area where we sell lists is, um, our, just our corporate data. So that's all publicly available. We make that available for free online, but for a fee, we do charge if you want to go and get a list. And again, right now that's all being compiled and done by a third party, and this would allow us to do it internally. Happy to answer any questions if there are any.

  5. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Utah Department of Commerce49:04

     Yeah, Mr. Chair. I, I, I believe that concludes our presentation. The key is, you know, working with this that, you know, there will be some additional things, but the Ital costs will be covered with within the, internally within the department, through the fees.

  6. Committee chair49:18

     Alright. Uh, I don't see any questions from the committee. Is there anyone in the public that would like to testify, talk, speak to this bill. Don't see any, we bring it back to the Committee for Action. Senator Vickers?

  7. Sen. Evan J. Vickers49:32

     Yeah, I would make a motion that we favorably recommend the Senate bill 84.

  8. Committee chair49:37

     That's in order. Any discussion to that bill? Seeing none. All of those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? That passes unanimously. Thanks.

  9. Sen. Evan J. Vickers (presiding)49:49

     Your permission. I'll come back up and we'll let Senator Ball to represent her bill. Okay. Well, like I said, we, we are juggling today.

• Jan 22, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (3 turns)

  1. Unknown speaker31:35speaker not certain

     Aye. Milner Musselman Owens Aye. Pitcher Plum rebe Sandal Aye. Stevenson Stratton Aye. Vickers Aye. Weiler Wilson. Wilson Winterton Aye.

  2. President Adams (presiding)32:02

     President Adams Aye. Senate bill 84, having received 25 yay votes, zero nay votes, four being absent. Shall we read a third time Senate bill 90 Senate Bill 90 occupational licenses for veterans and Service members? Senator Balderree.

  3. Sen. Heidi Balderree32:22

     Senator Balderree? Yes, Mr. President, I am excited to bring this bill forth today. Senate Bill 90 is a bill that I actually wanted to run my first year, but it just wasn't ready yet. Um, sometimes we're waiting upon the federal government. Sometimes you're waiting on the federal government. Um, sorry, we have a, I'll have a citation later today. And those, those are my visitors here too, but, okay. There we go. It just happened to coincide with the time I'm presenting my first bill. So double bonus. Um, anyhow, sometimes we're waiting upon the federal government and they often change their military codes and they were in the process of changing those codes so it wasn't ready. But today it's ready. So this bill, um, is super exciting because we are going to help our veterans. When our veterans retire, or excuse me, or, or they leave or exit the military and they try to find civilian work, they often face obstacles that are unnecessary and cumbersome. For example, I talked to a gentleman who, whose son was a top dog in an Air force for seven years, came home to Utah, which has a huge aerospace industry, but was unable to obtain work because he needed a piece of paper that he couldn't obtain in the state of Utah, but had to go to another state to obtain, to spend more time and more money to prove that he knew what he did. Um, this bill will create a clear and reliable path for veterans and service members to translate their military training and experience into Utah occupational licenses without

• Jan 23, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (6 turns)

  1. Sen. Evan J. Vickers24:57

     Uh, this bill does a couple of main things. It's, uh, by requesting the Department of Commerce, it creates the Department of Commerce Technology, education and Training Fund. And then it requires that the Division of Corporation commercial code to sell or license copies of filings received by the division. The fund is funded internally by fees that the division of corporation receives from fulfilling data requests and fees that Doppel receives for making this licenses public. The Department of Commerce is then required to use the money in the fund to pay the costs for prescribing, providing subscription services, training, providing education relating to licensing and business entities among other uses. With that, I'm open for questions.

  2. Senate President (presiding)25:38

     Thank you. Senator Vickers, there are no questions. I'll go to you for a motion.

  3. Sen. Evan J. Vickers25:43speaker not certain

     Wait further summation to move the Senate Bill 84 pass.

  4. Senate President (presiding)25:47

     Thank you. And the question is, shall Senate Bill 84 pass Roll call vote.

  5. Unknown speaker25:50speaker not certain

     Senator Ipson Spery Blue in Brammer Bus Cullimore Escamia Fillmore Aye. Grover Harper Hankins Aye. Ipson Aye. Johnson. Aye. K. Juab McKay Mikel Milner Musselman Owens Pitcher Plum Rebi Sandal Stevenson Stratton Vicars Aye. Weiler Wilson Aye. Weer Aye.

  6. Senate President (presiding)26:40

     Winterton Aye. Stratton Aye. President Adams Aye. Senate bill 84, having received 27 yay votes to zero nay votes, two being absent passes, this body will be sent to the house for their consideration.

• Feb 4, 2026 House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (31 turns)

  1. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:39:50

     agenda item number seven four Department of Commerce Amendments with Senator Ipson.

  2. Sen. Evan J. Vickers1:40:03

     Thank you, Mr. Vice Chair. Uh, seated with me today is Deputy Director Jacob Har, and he'll have a little bit of testimony on this as well. Senate Bill 84, the Department of Commerce provides access to information about businesses and, and license holders as a free service. Uh, organizations can ask, can also ask for the department to compile business or license information for a fee. Uh, currently third parties do this work and retain all the fees they charge. Senate Bill 84 would allow the Department of Commerce to do the, that work in-house and place the fees in a fund to improve its technology. And I think then simple nature, that's what the bill does. And if your permission, I'd like to turn some time to Deputy Director Hart.

  3. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:40:46

     Go for it, director. Thank you Mr. Vice Chair.

  4. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:40:48

     Um, we appreciate, uh, Senator Vickers for running, running this, um, when we're thinking about ways that we can Oh, will you, Will you introduce yourself? Oh, thank you. My name is Jacob Hart. I'm a Deputy Director at the Department of Commerce. Thank you. Um, when we were looking at ways that we could, uh, use our funds more efficiently, we saw that, um, all of these lists were being, um, sold without any of the funds returning to the fee payers. Um, and we saw an opportunity here to utilize that in a way that, um, goes back into the services that they're utilizing. Um, the main places we have lists are in Doppel where people can request if they meet certain criteria, they can request lists of contractors. And then also within our division of corporations, which of course registers all of our businesses. And, um, this hasn't changed the way that lists are provided or any of that. It just allows us to move that in-house and, um, kind of return that, um, that revenue back into, uh, the technology that we provide. So, sort of a simple overview. Happy to answer any questions you have as well. Yeah. And just in closing your presentation, you know, there certainly has the potential to save money. So that's, you know, that's, that's why we feel that's a good idea. With that Mr. Vice Chair, we're open for questions. Okay.

  5. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:42:17

     Thank you. Uh, Representative Sawyer.

  6. Rep. Jake Sawyer1:42:21

     Thank you. Uh, please correct me if I'm wrong, uh, but if I remember a number of years ago in my professional life, I could look up all of this information and it was free. Uh, can you help me understand why we're putting a paywall in front of that?

  7. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:42:34

     Sure. There isn't a paywall on the, um, information itself. So if you want to look up one individual, you can go do that. This is the service of compiling the information in a list, essentially. So, so

  8. Rep. Jake Sawyer1:42:49

     All businesses in their information is what you're saying?

  9. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:42:52

     Potentially either all businesses or a subset of businesses that you're interested in. Okay.

  10. Rep. Jake Sawyer1:42:56

      Perfect. Thank you so much.

  11. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:42:59

      Thank you Representative Thurston.

  12. Rep. Thurston1:43:01

      Thank you, Mr. Chair. So, um, typically when we talk about charging the public a service fee, the service fee in aggregate helps offset the cost of providing that service. But it looks to me like that you're intending to use this for many other things beyond the cost of providing the service. Um, can you help me understand why we should be collecting essentially a tax or a surcharge, surcharge really on this data so that you can have extra revenue for other things when you're already lapsing lots of money to the general fund?

  13. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:43:34

      Sure. So my thought here was that really this, this does go back into the service, right? 'cause we're talking about improving the technology overall as we look at the ability to provide both the lists and really the services surrounding the list, which includes the licensing and the registration and the, the overall system that puts these things onto the web, right? Um, are actually very, very expensive, right? And we support them in part through charging people directly a fee to register your business, right? That pays for this. But then the list as well can then go back into the, the technology that takes to not only service the list, but to actually, I mean, the whole system, right? Just, which is a lot more expensive than just the cost of providing the list. So yeah, if you look at it narrowly, you'd say, well, we just charge like a quarter, right? Because, well, these are lists that we can provide relatively easy, but when you think of it being on the back of a system that's really expensive, like a multi, a million dollar plus system to register corporations, for example, then it then actually think it does make sense that they participate in, in bearing the costs of that broader system, if that makes sense. So, so is your intent then, 'cause it doesn't say what the amount of fees, like presumably that we determine the fee scale. So it's, your intent is to collect enough fees from enough people using that system to pay for that system and get that just right so that there's not excess collection in the aggregate. That's, that's the ultimate goal of all of This, right? The goal, what I was thinking of with this particular fund is rather than having like a lapsing general fund type, uh, service, we run into issues where it's mid-year and we need $300,000 to repair this thing, right? That's sort of the idea that I had in mind for this particular fund, which is not, um, which is not just the general kind of lapsing area.

  14. Unknown speaker1:45:38speaker not certain

      Mr. Vice Sheriff, I could interject. You know, the thought is that we we're including, you know, the maintenance and operation of the, of the machinery and the technology as the part of the cost, Right? So it's the fully, fully capitalized cost of the program and the fees from the program in aggregate cover the aggregated cost of the program. And then the trick is getting those just right so that everybody who's using everybody who benefits from it's paying their fair share. And we're not getting too much money, we're just getting just enough.

  15. Unknown speaker1:46:09speaker not certain

      Okay, great. Thank you.

  16. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:46:12

      Thank you Representative Peterson.

  17. Rep. Thomas W. Peterson1:46:15

      Thank you Mr. Vice Chairman. Um, in a previous life I did education for inspectors and engineers and I, and I thought that we used to charge for mass lists. Do we not already do this?

  18. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:46:30

      We're already doing this. Sorry to clarify, this is something that's already being charged. We wouldn't charge any different new fees under this. We're just Currently it's being done by a third party vendor and they keep the fees at this point. You bring it in-house and allow us to utilize that in-house and keep those fees within the system.

  19. Rep. Thomas W. Peterson1:46:47

      I love the idea of us improving our technology. That's much needed. Thank you.

  20. Unknown speaker1:46:53speaker not certain

      Thank You. You, uh, I have a question. What, what is the technology? What, what are we talking about here?

  21. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:47:01

      So, two main platforms at the Department of Commerce that this, um, feeds into. One is the corporations registration system. Um, in other words, when you go online, you can just register your business through our automated software platform. Instead of bringing in paper, you go in and you type in your business name, you see if it's available and you can go through that whole process in an automated way online. The other item that it helps pay for is our licensing system. So all of our licensees, when they come in, they go through a, an online platform where they register. And so that's the other major software system that we have.

  22. Unknown speaker1:47:44speaker not certain

      Is this a proprietary software or is it a off the shelf thing that we're buying from someone?

  23. Jacob Hart, Deputy Director, Department of Commerce1:47:49

      Um, it's, it's proprietary. Yeah. So we, we have vendors that, um, do a software as a service for both of those platforms.

  24. Unknown speaker1:48:00speaker not certain

      Okay. Thank you. Alright.

  25. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:48:03

      Uh, we'll take this to, uh, it appears there are no more questions. We'll take it to public comment. Is anybody here that would like to speak to that, to this bill? Anybody on line? Okay. Uh, then we will, uh, take it to the Committee for action Representative Burton.

  26. Rep. Burton1:48:24

      Yeah. Thank you Mr. Chair. I like this bill. I, I remember in, in the federal system wishing that I could do something like this. And, uh, so I appreciate the senator for bringing it forward. So the, the motion, Mr. Vice-chair is to favorably recommend Senate Bill 84.

  27. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:48:41

      Okay. Uh, Senator Vickers, would you like to speak to that?

  28. Sen. Evan J. Vickers1:48:44

      No. Good discussion. Good questions. Thank you for that. And I'll waive further information.

  29. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:48:48

      All right. Any comments from the committee? Representative Thurston?

  30. Rep. Thurston1:48:52

      Yeah. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, where did Jacob go? Ni, nicely done answering my questions. That was actually very helpful. Uh, I am in support of the motion to favorably recommend. I think, uh, as we have done a lot of work trying to get fees to match program costs, uh, and sometimes we find that we're leaving money on the table, that we have people who are using it, who aren't paying their fair share, which means that somebody else is paying too much for it. And so I, I do appreciate this is an effort to make sure that everybody's paying their fair share and that we're covering the cost of those who use the system. So I am definitely in support of the motion. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

  31. Committee vice chair (presiding)1:49:26

      Okay. We'll take it back to the, to the sponsor. Uh, I think I wave some motion. Okay. All right. We'll, thanks. We'll go, go to the maker of the motion waive. All right. The motion is that we, uh, favorably recommend SB 84 Department of Commerce Amendments. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. And those against. Okay. Rule that that passes unanimously.

• Feb 11, 2026 House floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (19 turns)

  1. Speaker (presiding)16:35

     Senate Bill 84. Department of Commerce Amendments by Senator Vickers. This bill was heard in Business and Labor with a vote. 10 0 6. The House sponsors Representative Walter. Thank you, Representative Walter.

  2. Speaker (presiding)16:46

     But before I go to you, uh, the speaker announces a House Rules committee meeting in the House rules room. So all members of the House Rules Committee are excused for that meeting. Representative Walter?

  3. Rep. R. Neil Walter17:01

     Thank you Mr. Speaker. I move that we adopt the First Amendment to SB 84. Uh, we have that, but I don't have it with me, so we're gonna pull it up really quick. But, uh, that motion is in order.

  4. Speaker (presiding)17:32

     Representative Walter, would you like to speak to that motion?

  5. Rep. R. Neil Walter17:34

     Yes. There was a very minor clarification to make sure that this new fund that's being set up that, uh, will speak to, um, was actually set up properly. There was a, there was a technical correction.

  6. Speaker (presiding)17:46

     Thank you Representative Walter Discussion to the, uh, motion to adopt amendment number one under Representative Walter's name. See none. We'll go and place the motion. The motion before is the House adopt Amendment number one on SB 84 under Representative Walter's name. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Roll. That motion passes. The bill's been amended and before the body for further consideration. Back to your Representative, Walter.

  7. Rep. R. Neil Walter18:12

     Thank you Mr. Speaker. Uh, I appreciate the opportunity to speak to SB 84. This, uh, creates the Department of Commerce Technology, education and Transportation, uh, training, sorry, not Transportation Training Fund, um, in the Department of Commerce. Lemme explain what we're doing here. Uh, for, for many, many years, uh, department of Commerce, which you can think about, business entities, et cetera. Uh, they have been public records and there have been bulk public records requests that have been fielded by the Department of Commerce for many, for many years. Uh, those bulk records requests have a fee attached to them. Uh, the service of those bulk records requests has been outsourced, meaning that we're sending that to a third party vendor who, uh, the cost of facilitating or, uh, the cost of, um, uh, supporting that request is being paid, um, by the request store. And the money is going to a third party. This is being brought in-house and by bringing it and, and bringing it in-house, they're, they've created this, uh, they've created this fund that's mentioned in the bill. Um, the fund then will be used to, uh, support, um, act, purchase of technology. Um, there's also important opportunities to do training. For example, I'll tell you a brief story. Yesterday, uh, my wife, uh, called me and she said, I just helped, uh, a gentleman that, uh, that we know as a friend of our family, he was having trouble renewing his business license, and she sat down and helped him through the technology and through the software to do that. Now, there's lots of people that have questions about renewing business entities, et cetera. So what this does is allows us to take this, uh, regular request that's been going on for a long time, bring it in-house, um, we'll still continue to charge for the bulk records requests. It's important to note that if you go online and search, uh, the bi business entity search, those are still free. But the bulk requests that have a fee attached to them that would now come to this new fund, and they'd be able to use that fund to support, uh, uh, support, uh, operations in the Department of Commerce, including technology, training and et cetera. That concludes my presentation, Mr. Speaker.

  8. Speaker (presiding)20:18

     Thank you, Representative Walter discussion to the bill Representative MacPherson.

  9. Rep. Matt MacPherson20:24

     Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Will the sponsor yield to a potentially series of questions? Representative Walter, will you yield to a series of questions? I will yield to a potential series of questions. Thank you, representative. Yes, representative. Thank You, Mr. Speaker. Um, when it comes to this, uh, uh, I understand what the, uh, department, the division is, uh, looking to accomplish here. I guess my question, and maybe it's a concern as well, is how does this affect the actual cost to the, uh, to the cons to those individuals that are seeking bulk record data like this? Um, that it doesn't seem to be any particular price controls. This looks like a fund, uh, that that is a way for the state to generate additional revenue. Is the, is there any guardrails on this to ensure that this isn't being utilized as just simply a way to limit access to this data?

  10. Rep. R. Neil Walter21:17

      Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Uh, this is a great question. Uh, there, the way that they're going to charge in, in the pa the way that they've done this in the past, there isn't essentially a, uh, specific limitation. And so what we're doing here is we're not introducing, essentially, a new requirement. We're just authorizing them to continue their practice. The intent is, uh, to continue to keep the cost as, uh, low as possible. But what it does allow them to do is use those fees instead of to pay only a third party vendor. It allows them to use those, uh, fees that are generated for the bulk requests, uh, to support, um, the operations that are required to fulfill those tech, the, the, the technology to fulfill those requests and also to provide some other education. I do understand the concern, uh, Mr. Speaker about, uh, potentially using this to, uh, grow government revenue, um, accumulate resources at the expense of the public. And that's, uh, to be clear, that's not the intent of the proposed, uh, legislation.

  11. Rep. Matt MacPherson22:16

      Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Is there, is, does the agency itself by, by its own power essentially create, set, maintain, and control that fee, uh, that's associated with this? And could they unilaterally increase those? Is there any, I guess, uh, audit or any, any, uh, reporting on this that, that gives some visibility if we're allowing an agency to just tack on particular fees, whereas right now, if you go to third parties, there's going to be some market competition potentially for providing that service. So that keeps those rates a little bit lower, even though that we're paying 'em to a third party. I, I guess, can you, um, address that concern?

  12. Rep. R. Neil Walter22:58

      Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My understanding is all the fees that are charged by an agency to the public have to be approved by this body.

  13. Rep. Matt MacPherson23:05

      Okay, perfect. And then last question, Mr. Speaker, if it's okay, um, what, what method is used to obtain these records?

  14. Rep. R. Neil Walter23:14speaker not certain

      None of these would fall under, for example, grandma Bowl or other types of records requests that we'd be, uh, providing through now a fee service rather than through, uh, the grandma system.

  15. Rep. Matt MacPherson23:27

      I'm sorry, uh, Mr. Speaker, what is the question? Uh, I guess if, if, if, uh, I'm curious how these record bulk, uh, record requests are made. Um, and if they're made through the website, through an application process or if any of these records requests go through Grandma where they are making bulk record requests and they're charging a fee for those. I just want to ensure that we're not trying to change how Grandma works and the fee associated with this through this process.

  16. Rep. R. Neil Walter24:02

      Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Uh, this bill doesn't change any of that. And I wanna be really clear, uh, to the, uh, to the body that yesterday I went and I looked up a business entity. I wanted to, I wanted to see, um, some of those records that were public about that entity. Um, I'm able, I was able to look it up. Nothing is changing with this bill in terms of those individual records requests or, um, a bulk records request. The availability of those bulk records requests. And there's nothing that would prohibit somebody from submitting a records request or, uh, other, uh, gram I should say, a grammar request for certain types of information. So, uh, there's nothing in, in this bill that would change that. Again, all we're focusing on is bringing a particular service, um, in-house with the intent to be able to, uh, use some of those resource, have some flexibility to use some of those resources for training and education. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

  17. Speaker (presiding)24:59

      I thank you Representative MacPherson. Further discussion to the bill. Seeing none. Back to Representative Walter for summation.

  18. Rep. R. Neil Walter25:06

      I appreciate the, uh, body's time on this particular issue. Uh, I think this is gonna actually help in the long run with our ability to service the public and their desire to get access to certain types of information that are public about, um, entities and the way that they operate and other activities in that space. And so appreciate the body's support. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

  19. Speaker (presiding)25:25

      Thank you Representative Walter voting we'll now be open on SB 84 representatives. Let's quickly so we can get moving through some Senate bills and try and get some house bills done today. Representative Kohler seeing all present head and voting. Voting is now closed. SB 84 passes this body with 61 yes votes, seven no votes will be sent to the Senate for fur or yeah, sent to the Senate for further consideration. Madam Reading Clerk

• Feb 13, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (6 turns)

  1. Sen. Evan J. Vickers11:00

     to concur. We just made a, a minor amendment to, did not change the bill in any way, shape or form. Do some corrections. So motion to concur. Okay.

  2. President Adams (presiding)11:07

     A motion to concur. Do you want to just say and no with that explanation? I'll place the motion all in Any discussion, place the motion. All in favor say aye. Aye.

  3. President Adams (presiding)11:17

     Any opposed or let motion passes Senate bill 84 has been read three times. The question is, shall it pass? Roll call vote.

  4. Senate clerk11:24

     Senator Spry Aye. Lewin Brammer bus Cullimore Esia Fillmore Aye. Grover Harper Aye. Kins Aye. Ipson Aye. Johnson. Aye. Juab McKay Mikel. Aye. Milner Musselman Owens pitcher Plum Aye. Rebi Sandal. Sandal Sandal. Aye. Stevenson Stratton Vickers Weiler Aye. Wilson Aye. Winterton Aye. President Adams Aye. Senate

  5. President Adams (presiding)12:16

     bill 84, having received 24 yay votes, his zero nay votes, five being absent, passes his body and will be returned to the house for the signature of the speaker.

  6. President Adams (presiding)12:35

     Senator Winterton. Senator Winterton your mic. Go ahead.