Bills / S.B. 93
S.B. 93 Corrections Amendments
- Introduced
- Senate committee
- Senate vote
- House committee
- House vote
- Signed into law
What this bill does
The bill makes it a crime to operate an unmanned aircraft, such as a drone, near correctional facilities, which would prohibit flying drones in restricted prison airspace. It also removes the requirement that direct supervision be the only allowed way to supervise inmates, letting corrections staff choose supervision models suited to each area.
Plain-English summary written by AI from the official description. Check the official text below.
Official description
- amends provisions related to direct supervision
- amends the criminal offense of unlawful operation of an unmanned aircraft near a correctional facility by prohibiting an individual from removing any item from inside the property of a correctional facility
- removes unpaid probation and parole supervision fees from an offender's criminal accounts receivable and requires the Department of Corrections to turn any unpaid supervision fees to the Office of State Debt Collection
- makes technical and conforming changes
Your legislators on this bill
Enter your address to see what your own representative and senator did on this bill.
Quotes come from the official recordings' automatic captions, which can mishear words. Speakers and summaries are identified by AI and can be wrong. Use the ▶ links to check the recording.
Take action
This bill's session is over, but your legislators still want to hear from you. Ideas that died often come back next year.
Enter your address to get your legislators' contact information and a ready-to-send message about this bill.
Every vote
- 7 yes, 0 no, 2 absentSenate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee: Amendment Recommendation · Feb 12, 2026Who voted how
- 6 yes, 0 no, 3 absentSenate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee: vote to approve it · Feb 12, 2026Who voted how
- 24 yes, 0 no, 5 absentFirst of two Senate votes · Feb 24, 2026Who voted how
- 24 yes, 0 no, 5 absentFinal Senate vote · Feb 25, 2026Who voted how
- 9 yes, 0 no, 2 absentHouse Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee: vote to approve it · Mar 3, 2026Who voted how
- 59 yes, 1 no, 15 absentFinal House vote · Mar 6, 2026
Hearings and debates
- Feb 12, 2026 Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee▶ Watch
Transcript (32 turns)
- Committee chair1:13:04
So, um, nothing more fun than an afternoon like this one. All right. Uh, this is the speaker here, or Senator Owens coming forward. Um, we've got Senate bill 93 corrections amendments. I did tell the chief of staff for the speaker that when he arrived, we'd go to him next. So I'm, I'm kind of looking out for him because of his busy schedule. Senator Owens Senate Bill 93.
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens1:13:26
Thank you, Mr. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate, um, being in front of the committee. This is kind of, kind of our annual cleanup, uh, corrections bill and always a few changes. And, you know, sometimes we are receiving criticism for running bills. Uh, too many and, and I get that and probably deserve, but you also have to stay up with the times. And this one, uh, some of the changes just, it makes adjustments to corrections and, uh, some of their, uh, challenges. But first of all, it amends the, uh, criminal offense of unlawful operation of an unmanned aircraft, near correction facilities. So you can't take drones in and drop, uh, product or pick anything up. You now we need to make sure we, uh, Where's the fun in that? I know, right? Especially if it's all timed just right. So, uh, actually it's a, uh, director wants to speak to it. He can tell you what has what, why this needs to happen and a prevent. And the other main thing this really does is takes away the, um, the requirement of mandatory just using direct supervision as the only model. There are places in the correction facilities that can certainly still work if that's what the director chooses, and as the best operation going forward. But, uh, you know, maybe not in others parts of the prison. So this removes that overall cap that we needed to correct in statute. And, uh, we have the director with us, and I'll let him speak to any further correct changes or what we need in the bill.
- Committee chair1:15:05
Thank you. Please introduce yourself. Of course.
- Jared Garcia, Executive Director, Utah Department of Corrections1:15:10
Can you hear me? Yes. Yeah. Thank you. Senator Millner. And, and Mr. Chair committee members? My name's Jared Garcia. I'm the Executive Director for the Utah Department of Corrections. I'm gonna Interrupt you just a second hand a we just hand a flyer out my intern.
- Committee chair1:15:21
Sure, yeah. Um, let's have staff to it. We gotta turn, bring it around. Fine.
- Jared Garcia, Executive Director, Utah Department of Corrections1:15:26
Thank you. We do, we really do appreciate the changes to this bill. Drone legislation has just passed nationally because this has become such a huge problem in correctional facilities nationwide. Just last week, we, uh, stopped a drone drop from dropping a, a contraband cell phone and narcotics into the prison. And we know that these attempts happen frequently. So this just solidifies the statute and gives us the teeth that we need to address these issues. Criminally. Uh, additionally in regard to the direct supervision, I just wanna make it very clear that we believe in direct supervision. We think it is a part of the solution. We absolutely want our staff interacting with inmates and helping them to achieve, uh, successful reentry access resources and treatment. Uh, but there are parts of our prison such as restrictive housing, maximum security, that have less movement. They're locked down at times, and it's just not responsible for us to keep one or multiple staff just sitting in an area when they could be helping inmates in other areas where there's more movement. So really all this does is provides the flexibility that we need to operate our prison. It's really no different than policing in the community where you wouldn't just implement community oriented policing. You would want to implement data oriented policing and intelligence led policing along with community oriented policing. So this just provides the flexibility. And then I think the last thing I'd want to talk about, and that's what this flyer pertains to, is I think I've heard, and I've read this misconception that the Utah Department of Corrections is going away from tiered housing and pri tiered privileges. But I just want it to be very clear that we're, that's, it's actually the opposite. We're moving, we currently implement tiered housing and privileges, but we believe we can do it better in a more comprehensive way with better outcomes. Meaning we're gonna separate the bullies and the predators from the people that are trying to change their lives. We're going to move the middle. And that's what this flyer indicates, that we are moving towards a more comprehensive tiered housing model. We have working groups that are working towards that now, and we're simply waiting for the end of the session to make sure we can afford to do that before we make these changes. So, um, with that being said, I just again, wanna thank Senator Owens for his support and all of you for your support and, uh, we absolutely support this bill. Thank you. Thank you. And Mr. Chair, this, uh, I just want to say that with this, you know, they're going to need to be opening up Bear three here pretty quick, so these changes can help them have that flexibility. I really appreciate, I've heard the, the concern about this bill and that it takes away accountability of tiered housing and, and it doesn't, but, so that's why we handed this out today to show you what is in the works. I appreciate the bringing that up and share it with you. That concludes our presentation.
- Unknown speaker1:17:51speaker not certain
Thank you very much. And you know, I'm now wondering if, if I, you know, did some hard time, if anybody in this room would have, uh, enough loyalty to try to drop a cell phone to me with a drone, and would you include a fully charged battery and a charging cord? Maybe a second battery. I'm just giving ideas here, but I, I love the ingenuity. I love the fact that your inmates, some of the inmates just have that good of friends out there, so, but it seems like this bill is very necessary, so, alright,
- Committee chair1:18:18
let me ask by a show of hands, if there's members of the public that would like, uh, are there, I don't see any lights. So are there members of the public that like to testify in favor or against this bill? And if so, how many of you own drones? That's my question. Okay. I don't see any hands. Do we have any online? Virginia. Okay, we have two then. Okay. So, um, I'll, let's make a chair up there and then let's go online first to Virginia Rollins. And then if you'd like to come up, ma'am, we'll take two public comments.
- Committee chair1:18:47
So you'll be second. Yeah. Ms. Rollins, can you turn on your camera? Tell us your name and, uh, what county you live in. Oh, Um, Virginia, can you turn on your camera and tell us your name and what county you reside in and which you reside?
- Virginia Robertson Rollins, resident, Davis County1:19:09
So my name is, my name is Virginia. I'm Robertson Rollins and I'm in Davis County. And, um, with some of this, I understand this moving of the middle, but not all of those in antelope are necessarily, um, I know they're unrestricted housing, but some of them are there for safety reasons. So would there not be any direct supervision in that section allowing for those inmates to have, um, more access to programming and, um, because of the reason that they're there, they're not there because they're bullies, they're there for other reasons. So I feel like when you take away some of the direct supervision, those in antelope that are there for safety reasons get left out.
- Committee chair1:20:10
Alright. Thank you Virginia. 'cause they have Been hard. Thank you, Virginia. We'll, we'll let the sponsor, um, address that question in his summation if he chooses.
- Committee chair1:20:18
Let's go to the in person testimony, ma'am.
- Nadine Salyer, resident1:20:23
Um, thank you for the opportunity to speak. I'm just gonna read my statement. Yeah, That's fine. Um, I just wanna address the removal of the words shall and must from the statute. Statute. Um, in law, the words aren't decorative. Um, they create obligation. Sorry,
- Committee chair1:20:38
Ma'am, we need you to start with your name. Oh,
- Nadine Salyer, resident1:20:39
My name's Nadine Saer.
- Committee chair1:20:40
Okay. Nadine, thank you for being here. Are you representing your organization or just yourself?
- Nadine Salyer, resident1:20:45
Um, just myself as an advocate.
- Committee chair1:20:46
That's fine. Please proceed. I'm sorry to interrupt you.
- Nadine Salyer, resident1:20:50
Um, when, uh, the language is replaced with discretionary wording, the structure changes, um, and what was once required becomes optional. And what could be evaluated becomes harder to assess. And so for residents and families, um, this matters in practical ways. Mandatory language provides predictability, it creates clear expectations for how housing models are implemented and how progress is reported. And it gives lawmakers and the public something concrete to evaluate. And I know for, for families and residents, this bill is a major concern. So that's why I'm here today.
- Committee chair1:21:24
Alright. Does that conclude your testimony? Yes. Thank you very much. I'm gonna close the public hearing and bring this back to the committee for action or further for clarification. So that's a, that's a prompt for one of you to press a button. Um, Senator Escamilla.
- Sen. Scott Escamilla1:21:41
Um, thank you Mr. Chair. I make a motion that we pass SV 93 with a favorable recommendation.
- Committee chair1:21:49
Alright, we have a motion favorably recommend Senate Bill 93. Um, Senator Escamilla, if you, um, if you'll withdraw that motion. We do have an amendment. Um, Senator Owens, can you tell us about the amendment number one?
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens1:22:04
Oh, I don't have it in front of me, Senator. Um, I'm trying to remember what we did with that. You prompt me.
- Unknown speaker1:22:15speaker not certain
Yeah, it looks, looks like in lines 55 52. It just adds the words or pass due monthly supervision fees under section.
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens1:22:22
Oh yes. 64 dash 14 dash 2 0 4 6. I'll, I'll ask corrections, um, to come back.
- Committee chair1:22:27
Answer it's a, With that, if It seems technical. Senator Escamilla, would you move I amendment one?
- Sen. Scott Escamilla1:22:34
Absolutely. Thank you. So I would draw my original motion, Mr. Chair and make a motion that we, um, substitute, no, we just pass, um, amendment number one under the sponsor's name.
- Committee chair1:22:45
Alright, we have a motion to adopt amendment number one to Senate Bill 93. Discussion of that motion. Seeing none. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Cheryl of that passes unanimously. Seven to zero.
- Sen. Scott Escamilla1:22:58
Alright, now, Senator Escamilla Okay. Um, without Mr. Chair, make a motion that we pass, um, we recommend Senate Bill 93 as amended to the Senate floor.
- Committee chair1:23:09
Thank you. We have a motion favorably recommend Senate Bill 93 as amended. Senator Owens, would you like to sub? Uh, some briefly,
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens1:23:18
Mr. Chair? Thank you for the motion and moving the amendment. Um, I, I just want to reply to what, uh, the concern we, we don't, we, that's why we hire professionals, um, a director and his entire team. Uh, I, I don't think we want to get into the business of telling them each, uh, housing unit exactly how they should manage that or supervise just specifically to each one. So we'll leave that to them and, and, um, that's their, their profession. Um, so I think this is a really, really a cleanup and thank you for hearing it today. Thank you. Uh, Senator Escamilla, I'll waive summation.
- Committee chair1:24:00
Alright, all in favor of the motion. Favorably recommend Senate Bill 93 as amended to the floor of the Senate. Say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair rules of that passes unanimously. Seven to zero. Six to zero. We just lost one six to zero.
- Feb 24, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
Transcript (4 turns)
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens1:40:21
This is, uh, really the cleanup bill for Department of Corrections. It just does a couple of things. Um, we've had some challenges that for resident where drone activity is taking place around our correctional facilities, dropping or, um, attempting to pick up paraphernalia. Um, so this, uh, outlaws using drones and corrections airspace also, this removes the, um, it changes their supervision. So direct supervision is not required as the full, um, use of a supervised, uh, um, action by all of the guards. If that's what's needed. Direct supervision in one part of the prison, that's great, but it shouldn't be throughout. Uh, that is a act to protect officers And, um, there was some concern about that this was moving away from tiered housing, but it's actually opposite of that. That's what corrections is moving forward to. So that's what the bill does. It's kind of clean up. Bill, I'd be open to questions.
- Senate President (presiding)1:41:19
Thank you Senator. No questions going to you for a motion Call. A Question. The question is, shall Senate bill 93 be read a third time? Roll call vote.
- Unknown speaker1:41:28speaker not certain
Senator Spery Lewin Bramer bus Aye. Amore Aye. Escamia Aye. Fillmore Fillmore Aye. Grover Harper Kins Ipson Johnson k Juab McKay Mikel Milner Musselman Owens Pitcher Aye. Thumb Freebie Freebie. Sandal Stevenson Stratton Vickers Filer Filer Aye. Wilson Aye. Winterton Aye. President Adams Aye.
- Sen. J. Stuart Adams (presiding)1:42:20
Senate Bill 93 Having received 24 yay votes, zero nay votes. Five being absent shall be read a third time. Senator Fillmore, that concludes our work.
- Feb 25, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
Transcript (5 turns)
- Unknown speaker44:31speaker not certain
Oh yeah. President Pro tem.
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens44:35
How, how Senate Bill 93 is the corrections amendments. This bill addresses a, a cleanup, it addresses a few recent issues that have come to the Department of Corrections, such as the use of drones in, um, restricted airspace, which now will be restricted with the implementation of this bill. Uh, we have had drones intercepted that we're bringing in paraphernalia and other things. Um, so it outlaws that also that uh, instead of using one, uh, one way of supervising inmates called direct supervision, this allows the professionals who, uh, operate corrections to use whatever supervision model works in the partic particular space with different level of inmates. So that's the main two changes of the bill. With that, I'd be open to questions.
- Senate President Pro Tempore (presiding)45:29
Alright. That concludes his presentation. Any discussion to the bill? Seeing none, Senator Owens.
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens45:36
Okay. Thank you. Uh, call to question
- Senate President Pro Tempore (presiding)45:39
And the question is, shall Senate Bill 93 pass Roll call vote. Senator Vickers. Baldy Aye. Lewin Brammer Bus Comore Escamia Fillmore Aye. Grover Harper Kins Ipson Johnson Juab McKay Mikel Milner Musselman Owens Pitcher Plum Rebi Sandal Stevenson Stratton Vickers Weiler Wilson Aye. Winterton Mikel Aye. Rebe President Adams Senate Bill 93 having received 24 yay votes, zero na votes, five being absent passes and shall be sent to the house for their consideration.
- Mar 3, 2026 House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee▶ Watch
Transcript (26 turns)
- Committee chair27:06
Uh, Senator Owens, go ahead. SB 93 Up there.
- Sen. Derrin R. Owens27:15
Testing. There we go. Thank you, Mr. Chair and committee. It's good to be with you this afternoon. We have a, a Corrections Amendment bill, Senate Bill 93. It's really kind of a cleanup, but I want to explain, uh, what it does. And I have, um, deputy director, executive director, Mike Schoenfeld with me today, and he can explain a part of this to as well. This bill makes some correction adjustments, just as you're always trying to keep up with technology and, um, things that are happening. One thing this bill does is, um, it makes using drones by civilians in the airspace of prisons illegal. We, they have intercepted a some drone drop offs and pickups. So that is being addressed in this bill that's illegal in, uh, prison airspace, uh, changes. Um, a a little bit on the supervision site, and this where I'll ask, uh, direct deputy director Schofield to talk about it removes direct supervision of being the only type of supervision because it's not always appropriate. So if you'd address that, just introduce yourself. Director.
- Mike Schoenfeld, Deputy Director, Utah Department of Corrections28:32
Yes. Uh, thank you, uh, for allowing me to speak today. Uh, deputy Executive Director Mike Schoenfeld, uh, the Utah Department of Corrections, and I'll, I'll hit on the drones just really briefly since I spoke the other day in, in support of, um, representative Ballard's, um, uh, resolution, um, about the drones. Uh, they are a big problem for us, and we do support making those illegal for, uh, people to fly those around the prison airspace. So we are very much in support of that. And I want to thank, uh, Senator Owens for, for listening to us and taking the time to, to run this for us to make these adjustments, um, make that drone drone use illegal over our prisons, but also, um, to, to give us the flexibility to use, uh, dynamic, um, security as well as, um, the current supervision model, um, where we feel appropriate as we move towards more of a tiered housing model, uh, at the Utah State Prison and our Central Utah facility. Uh, we would like the flexibility to use direct or dynamic supervision, uh, as we see appropriate to make sure that our safety and security of our facilities, uh, Is, is sound. One other thing, committee that Bill does streamlines the fee collection process at the Department of Corrections. Uh, just really a few cleanup items that gets corrections in place to keep going forward for another year. With that concludes our presentation. Thank you. Turn to the committee for clarifying questions.
- Unknown speaker30:01speaker not certain
I wanna make sure I understand. Does it include jail space as well for the drone prohibition or is it, we just prison.
- Unknown speaker30:07speaker not certain
This was just the two prison sites. Um, that might be something we need to look at, Especially where we're housing so many prisoners at the county jails. Right, right. Had not thought of putting that in yet.
- Committee chair30:20
Okay. Uh, Representative Ballard.
- Rep. Melissa G. Ballard30:22
Yes. Just a quick question. So how does this align with the, uh, the FAA and overseeing airspace?
- Unknown speaker30:31speaker not certain
Uh, I, I don't think it has any issues with the FAA, just be, it would be, you know, down at where drones fly at 500 feet or whatever, but they just can't come inside of the fences and fly. So I think they intercepted one the other day that had a cell phone with it. And, uh, a paraphernalia, I can speak to that a little bit too. Representative, as long as they don't go above the, the floor or whatever the reg, you know, the regulation is, I don't remember what the line is. If you do, as long as they don't go above that, then it's not an issue. If they go above that, then FA be interested, but we're talking about a prohibition anyway.
- Committee chair31:11
Okay. Representative Gwen, sorry,
- Unknown speaker31:15speaker not certain
Sorry, just to follow up. Is this not, I know that drones can't operate within so many miles of an airport or military installation. Is the prison actually not within that footprint? Perhaps the prison in Salt Lake would be, but definitely not Gunnison.
- Unknown speaker31:38speaker not certain
Not Gunnison. And so this is both of them. Okay. Um, and I, we did not think of the county jails, but maybe we'll include that in the future if we need to. Um, but I, this, I think this was an incident was out here though, so,
- Unknown speaker31:52speaker not certain
Okay. And then follow up if I could then Yeah, I, I guess the other concern I have, and I don't know if you've talked to anybody, and if you have, I'd certainly like to know the answer, but where it's typically the FAA that regulates the airspace, what gives us the ability to do this? What gives us the ability?
- Unknown speaker32:10speaker not certain
Uh, it's not that you're flying, it's the prohibition. So we're just saying they can't, um, so this, this, when we built the Salt Lake prison, I remember running a cleanup bill one year where we had to, um, make it where, where there was a shooting range that the public couldn't access this one because it's the Salt Lake prison. So we're pro prohibiting using drones out in this space around the site. I, I understand that. I'm just, if a city council wanted to, I guess I'm just wondering, like, do we have the ability to prohibit that type of activity in the public airspace? Uh, yeah, I think if it flies inside of the, the prison fences, you know, when you have you own property, it's space above you as well. Right. But I also know that a drone operator can actually fly over property legally, and as long as it's not loitering, it's fine. Yeah. And so that's why I'm just wondering that's what we're, if we actually have the ability to do this, That's what we're saying. It would be a, it would be an offense to do that over the prison. Okay. Thank you.
- Committee chair33:19
Thank you, representative. I don't see any further questions. We'll turn to the public for comment. Is there anyone here from the public?
- Unknown speaker33:25speaker not certain
Thank you. Thanks, Mike. Thank you. No drone pilots. Just Me. Cartel delivery services? Nobody? Yeah. Okay.
- Daniel Strong, Director, Sentencing Commission, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice33:36
Hello, committee. Dan Strong from CCJJ. Happy to be here with you. On the last, last one of the session, I think, um, CJJ did vote unanimously to support this bill. We didn't get into the weeds quite as far as this committee has, but, uh, heard from our partners at corrections that this would help them, um, manage their facilities effectively. And also the, uh, we were also supportive of the, uh, provisions that deal with, uh, supervision and kind of directing that to higher risk individuals, um, primarily, so for those reasons, CCJA supports. Thank you.
- Committee chair34:07
Anyone else? Okay. Bring it back to the committee for discussion or action. I see plenty of discussion. Not quite enough. Action. There we go. Representative Hollins woman of action. Go ahead.
- Rep. Sandra Hollins34:24
Um, I move that we pass out SB 93 correction amendments with a favorable recommendation.
- Committee chair34:30
That's in order. Would you like to speak to it? I waive. Okay. Any discussion of the motion representative? Valard?
- Rep. Melissa G. Ballard34:42
There you go. I apologize. I just wanted to ask, what's the punishment if they do fly drone over and you're able to identify?
- Unknown speaker34:48speaker not certain
Who was the, Um, I, I think it's in the bill. I don't know. That memorized, not the punishment. I don't know. Maybe they could shoot it down with a shotgun or something and, okay. All Right. Thanks. I don't know if that's in the bill either, but I like it.
- Committee chair35:05
Any further discussion to the motion saying no? Would you like to som Senator Waive representative? I waive. I'll go ahead and place the motion. Alls in favor of passing out SB 93. Say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Say nay. It's done. Thank you, committee.
- Committee chair35:21
Thank you, Senator. Thank. Okay. Uh, representatives, you need, uh, notes or minutes for March 2nd meeting if somebody do it loud I can hear you. There you go. Thank you.
- Rep. Lisa Shepherd35:34
Everyone makes a motion that we approve our minutes on March 2nd.
- Committee chair35:36
Any discussion of the motion? Sing none and say aye. Aye. Or, or nay if you disapprove. Alright. They're approved.
- Committee chair35:45
Thank you. All right. Uh, Senator Plumb here. I think I saw her sitting there. There she is. Okay. I'm gonna hand the gavel off to, uh, my compadre here and follow Senator Owens back to the committee he's headed to as well.
- Mar 6, 2026 House floor debate▶ Watch
Transcript (6 turns)
- Unknown speaker2:32:19
The bill's been circled. Mad Marine Clerk Senate Bill 93 Corrections Amendments by Senator Owens. This bill was started in law enforcement and criminal justice with the vote of 9 0 2. The House sponsors Representative Burton.
- Speaker (presiding)2:32:30
Representative Burton.
- Rep. Jefferson S. Burton2:32:33
All right, thank you Mr. Speaker. Um, this bill addresses some of the challenges we've had at our new prison, uh, based on the construction model that was used, uh, initially, uh, when the prison was opened, uh, the Department of Corrections was using a methodology called direct supervision. And direct supervision requires that you have, uh, truly a full compliment of prison guards in order to implement it. And for those of you that have been out at the new prison, you, you, uh, understand what I'm talking about when I say there are many blind spots in that prison that aren't covered by cameras. Direct supervision was no longer, uh, possible in that facility. And so this, this bill amends those provisions regarding direct supervision. It amends criminal offense, uh, of unlawful operation of unmanned aircraft near a correctional facility. Believe it or not, uh, one of those unmanned aircraft were used to actually drop items into the prison, uh, that were confiscated by the, uh, members of the Utah Department of Corrections. Things like telephones and even drugs have been dropped into the prison using, uh, unmanned aerial devices. And so it prohibits those, uh, it removes unpaid probation parole fees from the offender's, criminal accounts receivable, and requires that the DOC Department of Corrections turn and paid supervision fees into the Office of Debt Collections. And that is the bill in a nutshell. Open to questions.
- Speaker (presiding)2:34:02
Thank you, Representative Burton. Uh, discussion to the Bill nine.
- Speaker (presiding)2:34:10
Back to your Representative Burton for summation, I'll waive summation has been waived. Voting will now be open on SB 93 vote quickly. Representatives seeing all present having voted voting is now closed. SB 93 passes this body with 59 yes votes one no vote and will be sent to the Senate for, uh, the signature signed by the speaker sent to the Senate for the signature of the president Representative Hall.
- Speaker (presiding)2:34:55
Thank you representative. That motion is in order.