S.B. 183 Surveillance Camera Amendments

What this bill does

S.B. 183 would bar law enforcement from tampering with privately installed surveillance cameras on private property, meaning covering, removing, or changing their direction. Exceptions would allow such actions with a court order, in exigent circumstances, or to protect officer safety, and the latest version also includes language on how the law applies to trail cameras.

Plain-English summary written by AI from the official description. Check the official text below.

Your legislators on this bill

Enter your address to see what your own representative and senator did on this bill.

Quotes come from the official recordings' automatic captions, which can mishear words. Speakers and summaries are identified by AI and can be wrong. Use the ▶ links to check the recording.

Take action

This bill's session is over, but your legislators still want to hear from you. Ideas that died often come back next year.

Enter your address to get your legislators' contact information and a ready-to-send message about this bill.

Every vote

• 9 yes, 0 noSenate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee: vote to approve it · Jan 30, 2026Who voted how
• 27 yes, 0 no, 2 absentFirst of two Senate votes · Feb 20, 2026Who voted how
• 23 yes, 0 no, 6 absentFinal Senate vote · Feb 23, 2026Who voted how
• 7 yes, 0 no, 4 absentHouse Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee: vote to approve it · Feb 25, 2026Who voted how
• 64 yes, 1 no, 10 absentFinal House vote · Mar 5, 2026
• 27 yes, 0 no, 2 absentSenate vote to accept the other chamber's changes · Mar 6, 2026

Hearings and debates

• Jan 30, 2026 Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (28 turns)

  1. Committee chair1:35:43

     Love having eight people here. Thank you. Senator Pitcher, would you like to present, um, Senate Bill 180 4 post-conviction offense amendments?

  2. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:35:53

     Yes, and I do think I will move on 180 3 as well. Oh, I'm, I'm sorry. Uh, yeah, let's do 180 3 first then. Okay,

  3. Committee chair1:35:58

     Great. Um, But 180 3. Okay. Wonderful.

  4. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:36:04

     Uh, Senate Bill 180 3 addresses, um, the placement of privately owned and installed surveillance cameras and, uh, law enforcement's ability essentially to, to modify those. And the issue came to me from, um, Mr. Craig, who is a defense attorney and a, a defense and immigration attorney. Um, and I think I'll just pass it over to you to kind of explain the incident and, and what happened and why we think this is probably important. So this one actually doesn't come in my necessarily official capacity as A lawyer, you pull that microphone a little bit closer. Wow. Normally I'm accused of being way too loud, so We don't wanna miss a word you Say. I know. And it's important. And

  5. Committee chair1:36:42

     Be sure to tell us your name. Adam Craig.

  6. Adam Craig1:36:43

     I actually am the owner of the largest private criminal defense firm and immigration firm in the city of Utah. However, this one comes because it, this pertains to something that transpired in our neighborhood. Um, we had a young man hang and kill himself, uh, around the corner from our home. Uh, the officers arrived and, and explained to him as an 18-year-old, he was gonna be charged with forcible sexual abuse. Uh, at that time, the officers came back to the house because they got a call, found that he had hung himself. And during that incident, while the officers were there, uh, we have it all on camera. One of the officers turned one of the cameras off, and we don't know why. Um, and it doesn't make sense to be able to do that in that kind of circumstance. Uh, unless there's some sort of obs obstruction, something's going on, something would impede their duties. But to touch a private citizen's camera equipment, uh, it doesn't make sense. And this is more because this is someone's private dwelling, there is no right on any side, whether it be law enforcement, whether it be anybody else to touch and or disable, uh, this time of type of surveillance equipment. I mean, we see more and more now and we want this type of equipment, surveillance equipment to be able to capture, see, uh, especially in people's private residence. So this one literally pertains to something that transpired within half a mile of my home. Uh, the set, the circumstances were sad enough, bad enough, we don't need to perpetuate them by taking away trust of the people that we have there to enforce our laws.

  7. Committee chair1:38:22

     Alright. Does that conclude your presentation?

  8. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:38:24

     I'll, and one more thing, Mr. Tro that I'll note is I do have a substitute, which, uh, I think is online at this point. Uh, since this bill was numbered, I've learned a lot about, uh, certain agreements that, uh, some entities have with law enforcement officials. One of those, um, well, I mean, this isn't an agreement, but one thing that, uh, came to my attention was the importance of exempting trail cameras. And so there's a substitute online which, um, would make that clarification. And so at some point I'd ask for the committee support for that as well. Well,

  9. Committee chair1:38:51

     Would you just make that motion?

  10. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:38:53

      Um, yes. If it's appropriate, I would move, uh, that we adopt sub one of SB 180 3.

  11. Committee chair1:38:59

      Alright. Discussion to that. Motion to opt, uh, to exempt trail cameras. Um, see no discussion. Um, all in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? No. Okay. Question. Oh, yeah, well, let, let me withdraw the vote. And go ahead. Senator Brammer.

  12. Sen. Brammer1:39:23

      Oh, yeah, Yeah. On the trail cameras, I mean, what I worry about on the substitute is, so are we saying that by doing this substitute, is it reasonable to interpret it as saying that law enforcement can tamper with trail cameras?

  13. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:39:45

      You could interpret it that way. Um, my hope is that there are some folks in the room that could better enlighten why this sub is important, because it's admittedly not my, we have A vol, we have a tribute, clearly volunteers tribute. Yeah. Okay. If that's okay, Mr. Chair, I think it would be better to hear it from them. Before I wanna hear

  14. Committee chair1:40:02

      A little About, can you please tell us your name and who you work for?

  15. Wyatt Bubak, Deputy Chief, Department of Natural Resources Law Enforcement1:40:08

      Is this on currently? Yes. I'm, uh, deputy Chief White Ock. I work for the Department of Natural Resource Law Enforcement. A coupled sessions ago, uh, has legislated that, uh, the use of trail cameras specific to the take of wildlife was to be restricted on public land, as well as some restrictions on private land as well. And so our concern with the prior to the substitution was just that the surveillance camera, uh, use of that was vague enough that it may be skewed or interpreted that if someone was using a camera in open space, whether it's public or private, because it doesn't designate that in the bill, excuse me, that they could justify or say that's a security camera of some sort. And we don't define what security cameras are in this bill. So it was just basically teasing out that, uh, the intent of the bill is not to necessarily regulate shell cameras in open space given the current text of the bill.

  16. Committee chair1:41:02

      Alright, sir, we'll need you to sign in. Yes, sir. Alright. Does that answer your question?

  17. Sen. Brammer1:41:07

      Um, I mean, I, I'm gonna vote against that. I, I think it should stay in, I I occasionally put truck cameras out on my farm. I got a busy chunk of people that come in and out, and I've, I've got pictures of people trespassing on my farm multiple times. I'd hate to think that that would somehow disappear. I mean, I, I'd want the same protection that your bill does. I, so, I, I don't, I don't like that. I'd rather stay in.

  18. Committee chair1:41:33

      Okay. Senator Brammer,

  19. Sen. Brammer1:41:35speaker not certain

      I think I don't have any other questions on it.

  20. Committee chair1:41:37

      Okay. Um, all right. Well, um, Senator Pitcher, would you like to sum on your motion to amend?

  21. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:41:46

      Yeah, let me offer one other question, a motion To substitute. I understand. Um, I guess I'd just offer one other possibility, which is maybe we need to go back to the drawing board on how we work out this substitute. And if it feels better to leave that for an issue that's addressed on the floor, I'd be open to that as well.

  22. Committee chair1:42:01

      Okay. All right. So, all in favor of the now controversial motion to substitute, say aye. Aye. Aye. Raise, raise your hands. Okay. Any opposed, say nay or, okay. So the motion to sub failed, but we still have the bill before us. And, and, and I think that's a compliment that they liked your original bill, so, okay. Thank you, sir. Um, and that's a very nice gun you have. Um, all right. So back to the original motion, uh, original bill. Let me ask by a show of hands if there's anyone else that wants to testify on this bill, either for or against it. Anybody online raising their hands? All right, Mr. Stewart, we'll go to you for one minute.

  23. Stewart (online)1:42:53

      Yeah. Alright. Yep. So that's Stewart representing myself. Just, uh, I've been thinking about this. Um, I, I, I think there's maybe nothing here that couldn't be addressed just by removing the applicable elements of qualified immunity for the law enforcement officers. I mean, an officer intentionally disabling a private security camera, um, could pose a serious problem under certain circumstances, such as, you know, he is ta tampering with evidence or destroying evidence, et cetera. Um, but there are other instances. Let's say there's a domestic terrorist and there's a drone and it's got a surveillance camera on it, would this forbid a law enforcement officer from disabling that drone in defense of other people. I, I think this is just kind of a, an overbroad thing that doesn't really apply to the, to all the situations. And I'm sure we could come up with a lot of other cases that may indeed even be more likely than the, the individual situation that happened here. So, for your consideration, thank you.

  24. Committee chair1:43:48

      Thank you. Alright. We're gonna close the public hearing and bring it back to the Committee for Action. Uh, Senator Pitcher, would you like to make a motion?

  25. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:43:56

      Yes, I would move that we, uh, pass out with a favorable recommendation, SB 180 3.

  26. Committee chair1:44:01

      Um, alright. Thank you. Discussion to that motion. Senator Musselman Juab,

  27. Sen. Musselman1:44:10

      Just really quick, based on the, what just happened with, I, I think there's another way to skin the cat. I think there's another way to do what they were wanting to do. And I'll, I'll, I'll talk with you offline on it though, and, and try to get with law enforcement and I think there's another way. So thank you. We'll talk.

  28. Committee chair1:44:28

      Okay. I, I, okay. All in favor of the motion to favorably recommend the bill with the understanding that Senator Musselman is gonna talk. Senator Pitcher say, aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Cheryl, that passes unanimously. Nine zero, um, 7 8 0 9 to zero.

• Feb 20, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (13 turns)

  1. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:33:24

     um, modify or tinker with private surveillance cameras on an individual's home. It creates an exception for when uh, there's an issue of officer safety, but otherwise states that officers should not, uh, tinker with privately installed surveillance cameras Happy to answer any questions.

  2. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:33:42

     Thank you. Uh, there looks like there may be a substitute online. Is there? Or just checking to see.

  3. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:33:52

     Yes, I was just, uh, texting to confirm that that's what needs to, that's the one that needs to be adopted and it is. So that would be my motion if we could adopt the second sub. Just wondered If you wanted to run that.

  4. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:34:01

     So the motion is to delete and title embody first, uh, Senate bill 180 3 and replace it with second substitute.

  5. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:34:09

     I thought so. Uh, do you wanna explain those changes again in the second substitute?

  6. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:34:13

     Yes. This is just some consensus language regarding trail cameras and, um, their application in this statute.

  7. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:34:21

     Okay. I'll place the motion. All in favor? The motion to substitute say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Will the motion pass? This bill is substituted Any further presentation on the bill?

  8. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:34:32

     Always. Okay. Looking for discussion on the bill. Say no discussion. I'll go back to you for summation and a motion.

  9. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:34:43

     I move that second substitute SB 180 3. Be read for a third time.

  10. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:34:47

      Thank you. And the question is, shall second substitute Senate bill 180 3? Be read for a third time. Roll call vote.

  11. Unknown speaker1:34:52speaker not certain

      Senator Vickers Baldry Aye. Lewin Aye. Brammer bus? Aye. Colmore Escamilla. Aye. Fillmore Grr. Harper Kins Aye. Sson Aye. Johnson. Aye. K. Juab McKay Aye. Mikel Milner Aye. Musman Owens pitcher Pitcher a Plums Rebe sandal Aye. Stevenson Stratton. Yes. Vickers. Weiler Aye. Wilson. Aye. Winterton President Adams Aye.

  12. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:35:47

      Second substitute Senate Bill 180 3. Having received 27 yay votes, zero nay votes. Two being absent shall be read A third time

  13. Senate President Adams (presiding)1:36:01speaker not certain

      Senate bill 180 4 Senate Bill one Senate bill 180 4. Post-conviction offense amendments. Senator Pitcher. Senator Pitcher. Three in a row.

• Feb 23, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (11 turns)

  1. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher14:38

     as ring camera on private property. Happy to answer any questions.

  2. Presiding officer (Senate)14:42

     Thank you. So discussion to the bill. Senator Weiler.

  3. Sen. Todd Weiler14:47

     Alright, Um, will The sponsor yield? Will you yield Senator? Yes. Okay, go ahead.

  4. Sen. Todd Weiler14:53

     Can you, can you define tampering with

  5. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher14:58

     So either covering, removing, or changing the direct the direction of the camera.

  6. Sen. Todd Weiler15:03

     Thank You Mr. Chair.

  7. Presiding officer (Senate)15:06

     Thank you. Further discussion. The bill sign Senator Pitcher back to you for a motion.

  8. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher15:10

     Thank you. I move that second substitute, uh, Senate bill 180 3 pass.

  9. Presiding officer (Senate)15:15

     And the question is, shall second substitute Senate bill one eighty three pass rule call vote.

  10. Senate clerk (roll call)15:19

      Senator Vickers Baldy Lein Brammer Aye. Bus comore Escamilla Aye. Fillmore Grover Harper Aye. Hankins Aye. Ipson Aye. Johnson Kwan McKay. Aye. Mikel Aye. Milner Musselman Owens pitch Aye. Plum Rebi Sandal Stevenson Stratton bickers Aye. Weiler Aye. Wilson Aye. Winterton Aye. President Adams

  11. Presiding officer (Senate)16:10

      Second substitute Senate Bill 180 3. Having received 23 yay votes, zero nay votes, six being absent passes, the Senate will be sent to the house for further consideration.

• Feb 25, 2026 House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee▶ Watch
  Transcript (19 turns)

  1. Chair Wilcox1:46:51

     Unanimous. Thank you, representative Senator Pitcher, the time is yours.

  2. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:46:55

     Thank you, Mr. Chair. It's nice to be here. Um, let me pull up the bill really fast. So I'm presenting on, I think it's 180 7, 180 5. Okay. What was that, Senator? Sorry, I'm just bringing up the language. We've subbed it and so I wanna make sure that I'm speaking to the, to, uh, the correct version. Gimme just a moment. 83. Okay. So, uh, Mr. Chair and, and colleagues, this bill arose, uh, this, well, let me back up. This bill deals with, um, survey privately installed surveillance cameras on private property. And this bill arose out of an incident that a colleague of mine experienced. Uh, this is, uh, Adam Craig, and I've invited him to share a little bit about what happened. Um, and in fact, maybe we'll start there and then I'll explain more about what the bill does.

  3. Adam Craig1:47:48

     Good morning. Members of the committee. Mr. Chair. My name is Adam Craig. I've testified numerous times, but this one actually comes before you because of something that happened in my own neighborhood. Um, the, the Draper Police Department showed up at the home of one of our neighbors, explained to a young man that he was going to be charged with some fairly significant charges. Um, unfortunately, the young man ended up 45 minutes, li later taking his own life. When the officers arrived at the home, they looked through the home, they Provo they started performing their investigation. And at one point during that investigation, one of them disconnected one of the surveillance cameras. Now, I don't think it was nefarious, but it caused the mother and the father to just really, really, really caused extreme angst aggravation concern, because they couldn't comprehend why a, their own personal private security camera had been disconnected, which is not appropriate ever. And again, I'm not saying it was nefarious or in any other way, shape, or form, but it just shouldn't be done. Uh, it was already hard enough losing their child, having the child there in the home, having him take his own life. So when we saw that, uh, I Uintah Senator Pitcher and said, Hey, this is probably something we shouldn't even have to bring up, but because it's happened, we, we can't let this happen again. And, and it pertains to personal security. Uh, we use them more and more often. They're a tool that can be used in all sorts of shapes and fashion, and they provide security for us. So it should never be disconnected. And I'll share that. I think this, this incident raised some really interesting conversations with law enforcement regarding the approach with, uh, on private property. Um, I, I think we have the bill to a good place. So I, in the course of running this legislation and learning more about law enforcement approaches, I understand that there can be cer uh, exigent circumstances that may exist, particularly at the, during the execution of a search warrant. And so this bill accounts for either exigent circumstances or officer safety, but otherwise, um, states that, uh, private property should be left untouched. And so with that, I'm happy to answer any questions.

  4. Unknown speaker1:49:51speaker not certain

     Thank you. I wanna make sure I understand the exemptions. What are the exemptions that you're contemplating?

  5. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:49:58

     Yeah, so I think they're found under, um, let's see, under sub two C. Um, so either exigent circumstances or in order to protect a law enforcement officer's safety while executing a warrant, um, if that individual is acting on behalf of law enforcement and provides a notification after the fact. So notifying before obviously defeats the purpose,

  6. Unknown speaker1:50:29speaker not certain

     Defeats the purpose. Yes, I've been there when that would've not made sense.

  7. Unknown speaker1:50:35speaker not certain

     Okay. Um, I think that's the only question I have.

  8. Chair Wilcox1:50:39

     Is there any other questions from the committee? Are there any, try to use correct grammar when you're, you know, doing this. Okay. Seeing none. Is there anyone from the public here to speak to it?

  9. Unknown speaker1:50:54speaker not certain

     Nate Mutter's online. We couldn't get him to come downstairs again.

  10. Chair Wilcox1:51:01

      Okay.

  11. Nate Mutter, Chair, Law Enforcement Legislative Committee1:51:06

      Uh, thank you. Chair committee. Uh, Nate Mutter, chair of law enforcement, legislative, uh, legislative committee, uh, coming to you, uh, homesick in, in Davis County, which is why in person, I, I, I felt like I shouldn't share what I have. That's, um, but, uh, appreciate, uh, we, we wanna share, uh, our appreciation, uh, for Senator Pitcher and working with us. Our group is neutral on this bill, but, uh, Senator Pitcher was great to work with us and, and alleviate our concerns as it pertained to, to officer safety issues. And, uh, uh, she, she, um, you know, covered that in, in the substitute. And, uh, again, just wanted to, uh, say thank you for her willingness to work with us. Thank you.

  12. Chair Wilcox1:51:50

      All right. Thank you. Anybody else? No. Okay. Return to committee for discussion or action. Representative Hollins, go ahead.

  13. Rep. Hollins1:52:05

      I move that we adopt first substitute of SB Second substitute. Oh, sorry. Second substitute of, of SB 180 3.

  14. Chair Wilcox1:52:17

      That's an order. Would you like to speak to it?

  15. Rep. Hollins1:52:18

      I'll waive. Okay.

  16. Chair Wilcox1:52:20

      I'm turn to the committee for discussion. May say none. Senator, would you like to sum?

  17. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher1:52:29

      I'll waive. Thank you. Representative Hollins. I'll Waive Now.

  18. Chair Wilcox1:52:33

      I'll go ahead and place the motion. All those in favor of passing out second substitute Senate bill. 180 3, say aye. Aye. Now it's already there. Adopting. Any opposed, say nay. Okay. It's unanimous. Thank you, representative. Thank you, Senator. Thank you. Good to see you, Adam. Okay. All right. One final motion. Adjourn.

  19. Chair Wilcox1:52:58

      Motion to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Say nay. All nay. All right. We have, uh, Representative Shepherd, what is that? Seven to one six. Six to one. Representative Shepherd wants to stay. Anyone that wants to stay with Representative Shepherd, you're welcome to, but we are adjourned. Good. How are you? Good. Good. Good.

• Mar 5, 2026 House floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (14 turns)

  1. Speaker (presiding)15:16

     Senate. Third Reading calendar, Second substitute, Senate Bill 180 3, surveillance Camera amendments by Senator Pitcher. This bill was served in law enforcement and criminal justice with the 7 0 4, the House sponsors Representative Teuscher, Representative Teuscher.

  2. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher15:33

     Thank you Mr. Speaker. This is a very simple bill. It simply prohibits law enforcement from tampering with changing the viewing direction of or disabling an individual's surveillance camera like a ring camera. Um, as long as the camera's installed on the, per the person's private property. Now we have exceptions, clear exceptions in the bill, um, if it, uh, if they need to apply for a court order, if it's exigent circumstances or otherwise, to protect officer safety. Now I know that the, um, the good police chief from Roy has been working, um, on this issue and has some thoughts on it, uh, has made the bill a little bit better. And so I look forward to a, a great substitute from him as well. But otherwise, Mr. Speaker, happy to answer any questions about the bill.

  3. Speaker (presiding)16:16

     Thank you Representative Teuscher discussion to the bill Representative Gwen.

  4. Unknown speaker16:21speaker not certain

     Thank you Mr. Speaker Pro tem motion to adopt third substitute in my name.

  5. Speaker (presiding)16:26

     That's in order. Would you like to speak to it?

  6. Unknown speaker16:28speaker not certain

     Yes, it uh, bill's a great bill. I've been working with the sponsor, um, the area surrounding, uh, the officer, uh, manipulating a camera when an exigent circumstance doesn't exist or a warrant doesn't exist, just we sought more clarity. Uh, we were concerned about interpretation, we were concerned about training, and we wanted to make it absolutely clear when an officer can in fact manipulate a camera, absent a warrant or an exigent circumstance. That's all the sub does.

  7. Speaker (presiding)17:00

     Thank you, representative Gwen.

  8. Speaker (presiding)17:02

     The motion is to adopt third substitute Senate bill 180 3, representative usher to the motion to substitute.

  9. Unknown speaker17:07speaker not certain

     Yeah, I really appreciate the great work that, uh, good representative for Roy has done on this and I think it's a better bill.

  10. Speaker (presiding)17:13

      Thank you. The motion is to adopt third substitute Senate bill 180 3. Further discussion. C None. Representative Gwynn for summation. I

  11. Unknown speaker17:20speaker not certain

      Waive. Thank

  12. Speaker (presiding)17:21

      You. Summation is waived. I'll place the motion. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Say no. Motion carries. The bill is substituted. Further discussion to the bill. See none. Representative Teuscher for summation.

  13. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher17:35

      I'll waive. Thank you. Submission is waived.

  14. Speaker (presiding)17:37

      Voting is open on third substitute Senate bill 180 3 Surveillance camera amendments Representative Matthews seeing all present having voted voting will be closed. Third substitute Senate bill 180 3 having received 64 yay votes and one na vote passes the house would be sent to the Senate for further consideration matter. Meeting clerk

• Mar 5, 2026 House floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (9 turns)

  1. Unknown speaker16:33speaker not certain

     the area surrounding, uh, the officer, uh, manipulating a camera when an exigent circumstance doesn't exist or a warrant doesn't exist, just we sought more clarity. Uh, we were concerned about interpretation, we were concerned about training, and we wanted to make it absolutely clear when an officer can in fact manipulate a camera, absent a warrant or an exigent circumstance. That's all the sub does.

  2. Speaker (presiding)17:00

     Thank you, representative Gwen. The motion is to adopt third substitute Senate bill 180 3, representative usher to the motion to substitute.

  3. Unknown speaker17:07speaker not certain

     Yeah, I really appreciate the great work that, uh, good representative for Roy has done on this and I think it's a better bill.

  4. Speaker (presiding)17:13

     Thank you. The motion is to adopt third substitute Senate bill 180 3. Further discussion. C None. Representative Gwynn for summation. I

  5. Unknown speaker17:20speaker not certain

     Waive. Thank

  6. Speaker (presiding)17:21

     You. Summation is waived. I'll place the motion. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Say no. Motion carries. The bill is substituted. Further discussion to the bill. See none. Representative Teuscher for summation.

  7. Rep. Jordan D. Teuscher17:35

     I'll waive. Thank you. Submission is waived.

  8. Speaker (presiding)17:37

     Voting is open on third substitute Senate bill 180 3 Surveillance camera amendments Representative Matthews seeing all present having voted voting will be closed.

  9. Meeting clerk18:51

     Third substitute Senate bill 180 3 having received 64 yay votes and one na vote passes the house would be sent to the Senate for further consideration matter. Meeting clerk

• Mar 6, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ Watch
  Transcript (5 turns)

  1. Unknown speaker10:49speaker not certain

     Do you wanna explain the changes?

  2. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher10:50

     Yes. This just includes some stakeholder language clarifying the process for, um, the accessing of private surveillance cameras.

  3. President (presiding)10:57

     Thank you. See no discussion. I'll place the motion. All in favor say aye. A. Any opposed? Will The motion passes. Third substitute Senate bill 180 3 has been read three times. The question is, shall it pass? Roll call vote.

  4. Unknown speaker (Senate clerk, roll call)11:12

     Senator Spery Lewin Aye. Brammer bus Aye. Fillmore Escamia Aye. Fillmore Grover. Aye. Harper Kins Ipson Johnson Quan McKay Mikel Milner Musselman Owens Cher Plum. Yes. Thumb Rebi Sandal Stevenson Stratton. Yes. Vickers Aye. Weiler Aye. Wilson. Aye. Winterton President Adams Aye. Third

  5. President (presiding)12:04

     substitute Senate Bill 180 3. Having received 27 a votes to zero nay votes, two being absent passes this body and will be returned to the house for the signature of the speaker.