Bills / S.B. 322
S.B. 322 Educational Technology Regulatory Sandbox
- Introduced
- Senate committee
- Senate vote
- House committee
- House vote (stopped here)
- Signed into law
What this bill does
This bill creates a voluntary, time-limited pilot program that lets Utah public schools test AI and education technology tools in classrooms, with pilots lasting no more than three years. Vendors must pass safety testing before a pilot, report safety failures to the state within 48 hours, and keep the tools under monitoring, and any statewide use requires legislative approval.
Plain-English summary written by AI from the sponsor’s presentation in committee and on the floor. Check the official text below.
Official description
- creates the Educational Technology Regulatory Sandbox
- establishes minimum standards for artificial intelligence use in public education
- coordinates with the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy
- assigns pilot administration to the Office of Regulatory Relief
- establishes an Education Technology Advisory Council
- limits the State Board of Education's role in pilot application approval
- provides for state board safety and privacy enforcement
- requires vendor safety testing through red teaming
- requires evidence-based evaluation
- requires state board review and legislative authorization before statewide adoption
- establishes evidence-based criteria for state board recommendations
- provides coordination with innovative education programs
- integrates crisis response with SafeUT infrastructure
- establishes parental transparency and opt-out rights
- maintains educator authority over grading and instructional decisions
- maintains academic integrity and authentic student work standards
- establishes student rights to transparency and human review
- integrates enforcement of Title 53E, Chapter 9, Part 3, Student Data Protection
- creates safe harbor for de-identified data
- establishes vendor accountability and transparency requirements
- provides liability protection for good-faith compliance
- prohibits artificial intelligence systems from simulating romantic or personal relationships with students
- requires annual safety reviews for multi-year pilots
- establishes educational principles to guide artificial intelligence deployment
- establishes legislative findings regarding education technology regulation
- requires historical source integrity for AI-supported instruction in history, civics, and social studies
- requires independent evaluation and legislative reporting upon request
- provides technical assistance for Utah-based education technology companies
- grants rulemaking authority to the state board
- provides a five-year sunset
What it costs you
- The fiscal note says this bill doesn't change anyone's taxes or fees. It moves about $41,600 in FY2027between the state's own accounts.
- State spending from tax funds goes up by $860,300 in FY2027.
From the bill's latest official fiscal note, counting the state's tax funds (General, Income Tax, Education, Uniform School, and Transportation) in the first full budget year after the session. Some bills take effect partway through that year, so later years can be larger; the note shows each year. Household count: U.S. Census Bureau. An average is a starting point, not your bill.
Your legislators on this bill
Enter your address to see what your own representative and senator did on this bill.
Quotes come from the official recordings' automatic captions, which can mishear words. Speakers and summaries are identified by AI and can be wrong. Use the ▶ links to check the recording.
Take action
This bill's session is over, but your legislators still want to hear from you. Ideas that died often come back next year.
Enter your address to get your legislators' contact information and a ready-to-send message about this bill.
Every vote
- 4 yes, 0 no, 3 absentSenate Education Committee: vote to change the bill · Mar 2, 2026Who voted how
- 5 yes, 0 no, 2 absentSenate Education Committee: vote to approve it · Mar 2, 2026Who voted how
- 24 yes, 0 no, 5 absentFinal Senate vote · Mar 3, 2026Who voted how
- 6 yes, 0 no, 9 absentHouse Education Committee: vote to approve it · Mar 4, 2026Who voted how
Hearings and debates
- Mar 2, 2026 Senate Education Committee▶ WatchRead the transcript (17 turns) →
- Mar 3, 2026 Senate floor debate▶ WatchRead the transcript (9 turns) →
- Mar 4, 2026 House Education Committee▶ WatchRead the transcript (22 turns) →