Legislators / James A. Dunnigan

James A. Dunnigan
Republican · House District 36 · Speaker Pro Tempore
Hear from them directly
Contact Rep. James A. Dunnigan
- Email: jdunnigan@le.utah.gov
- Phone: 801-840-1800
- Office: 3105 W 5400 S STE 6, TAYLORSVILLE, UT, 84129
Constituents get priority, so say you live in their district. Writing about a specific bill? Open it and use Take action for a ready-to-send message.
Watch or join a meeting
Every committee hearing and floor session is open to the public and streamed live on le.utah.gov. Each committee's agenda has the link to watch or join online, and how to sign up for public comment.
James A. Dunnigan serves on:
- Criminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee
- House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee
- House Political Subdivisions Committee
- Economic Development and Workforce Services Interim Committee
- Political Subdivisions Interim Committee
- Legislative Process Committee
What they've said
245 remarks on 49 billsH.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Explains that the Senate removed a growth development plan requirement for certain second class counties, adds Utah County and council-manager counties to the bill's provisions, and lets those counties change who they delegate accounting services to.
▶ Watch at 13:30Read what they said
Yes. Uh, Senate did a couple things. Uh, one thing is there was a, a portion in the bill that required second class counties bordering first class counties, which have been in Summit Illa to do a growth development plan that's been taken out. So that's no longer required since it passed the house. Utah County said they want in, uh, to the p provision for second class counties. So their city's contacted me and their county contacted me. So they're included in this inner city island, uh, annexation and then also for counties with a council manager form of government, which are Twila Summit and Wasatch. It allows them the ability to change who they delegate accounting services to. …
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says substitute four was never adopted and the notice language has not changed.
▶ Watch at 16:05Read what they said
We never adopted sub four. The language about notices and all that. There's no, that's still in there that was not changed. Sub four was never adopted.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says affected residents will receive mailed notice, the county must post notice, and officials will be notified before annexation occurs.
▶ Watch at 16:22Read what they said
Mr. Speaker. Everybody will receive it's impacted, will receive a notice to their mail. The, the county has to post it and they can notify the, the officials. So they'll they'll have notice before it happens and they can respond to it.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says residents can talk to county officials, who may choose not to annex an island after notice is given.
▶ Watch at 16:49Read what they said
Absolutely. They can talk to their county officials. And the county officials have the option to not incorporate any particular island if, you know, people don't wanna be incorporated After the notice has been given.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says residents can contact county leaders at any time and ask to opt out of annexation.
▶ Watch at 17:03Read what they said
Well they could, Mr Speaker, they can reach out if they know that they're an inner city in I City Island, they can reach out to their county leaders at any time. And Nassau County leaders that tell 'em they don't wanna opt in, that they wanna opt out.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says county commissioners make the decision, residents can speak with them, and commissioners can opt islands out.
▶ Watch at 17:41Read what they said
It'll be up to the, the county commissioners. They, they'll just like any notice, the uh, residents can go speak with their commissioners. The commissioners will make the decision, but the citizens will be notified of the proposed annexation. And again, if there's one or two or three islands that people don't want to, they tell the commissioners, commissioners have the ability to opt out or the Yeah. Of the opt those islands out.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Confirms that islands can be opted out after notice and notes that a map of the islands is available.
▶ Watch at 18:08Read what they said
Yes. Or they can. Okay. Thank You. I mean, we have a map. They, the islands are identified right now and we have a map that's available for anybody that's interested.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
In closing, says the sponsor worked with counties and cities on notice of proposed annexations and encourages support.
▶ Watch at 18:53Read what they said
Thank you Mr. Speaker. I appreciate the questions. So we have worked very carefully with the counties, with the cities to try to address uh, the concerns we put in the notice of, uh, proposed annexations so the public will be aware and I encourage your support.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Moves to suspend the rules so the bill can be considered read for first, second, and third time after the title changed.
▶ Watch at 19:27Read what they said
Thank you Mr. Speaker. So since the bill left the house, the title of the bill has changed. So just to be safe, I move the under suspension of the rules. We suspend the constitutional three readings requirement and consider the bill read for first, second, and third time.
H.B. 457 County Governance Modifications · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Says the change only affects the title and that the title is considered read three times out of caution.
▶ Watch at 19:46Read what they said
If we just change the title and out of a abundance of safety, we're gonna consider the title's been read three times.
H.B. 498 Utah App Store Accountability Act Amendments · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Dunnigan said the Senate amendments added an immediate effective date for the part that removes the Consumer Protection Division as a regulator.
▶ Watch at 26:29Read what they said
Yes. We added, uh, an immediate effective date for the part that removes the Consumer Protection Division as a regulator.
S.B. 201 Shelter Animal Euthanasia Amendments · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Speaks against the substitute motion, saying larger counties can easily do this.
▶ Watch at 1:43:42Read what they said
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I speak against the substitute motion to amend, uh, the many people that I've talked to about this. I, I, I think these larger counties can easily do this. They're by far, they're the ones that are taking the most animals and numerous, whether it's the shelters or the animal control providers, uh, run by the government, they, they say that this makes sense, it can do it. So I'm speaking against the substitute motion to amend.
S.B. 78 Property Tax Relief Amendments · House floor debate (day 45) · Mar 6, 2026
Said seniors at his town halls liked not paying property taxes but disliked having to pay the tax when the property is transferred, and that they would prefer the current circuit breaker program.
▶ Watch at 2:28:27Read what they said
Thank you Mr. Speaker. So I, I had the opportunity last couple weeks to discuss this at my town halls, which we had a lot of seniors attend. And they really liked the idea of not having to pay property taxes. They get older based on their income. I said, there's only one thing when the property's transferred, transferred, you have to pay the property tax. They didn't like that part at all. And they said, well, we like the part where we don't have to pay it, but we don't have to want to pay it later either. I said, that's not the proposal. And so they said, well, then we'd rather have the current circuit breaker program. So …
H.B. 312 School Curriculum and Standards Modifications · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Asks whether the House amendment is substantially the same as the bill that failed in House committee.
▶ Watch at 1:44:14Read what they said
Is the substitute or the amendment that the house put into your bill to sub, is it substantially the same as what failed in the house committee?
H.B. 312 School Curriculum and Standards Modifications · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Raises concern that the bill adds about $60 million to current curriculum spending without guaranteed savings if local districts do not adopt it.
▶ Watch at 1:45:01Read what they said
Speaker, Mr. Speaker? Mr. Speaker, I'd like to recall my, my time. Thank you. I think the sponsor answered my question. Um, my concern with this is we're already spending a couple hundred million dollars, whatever it is on curriculum, this is another 60 million and if the LEAs don't adopt this, then we may be spending what we're currently spending plus the additional amount and not really having any, any savings. That's my concern. Thank you Mr. Speaker.
From the official recordings' automatic captions, with speakers and summaries identified by AI. Use the ▶ links to check the recording before you rely on a quote.