Legislators / Christine F. Watkins

Christine F. Watkins
Republican · House District 67
Hear from them directly
Contact Rep. Christine F. Watkins
- Email: christinewatkins@le.utah.gov
- Phone: 435-650-1969
- Office: 1548 E 5700 S, Price, UT, 84501
Constituents get priority, so say you live in their district. Writing about a specific bill? Open it and use Take action for a ready-to-send message.
Watch or join a meeting
Every committee hearing and floor session is open to the public and streamed live on le.utah.gov. Each committee's agenda has the link to watch or join online, and how to sign up for public comment.
Christine F. Watkins serves on:
- Economic and Community Development Appropriations Subcommittee
- House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee
- House Public Utilities and Energy Committee
- Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee
- Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Interim Committee
- Child Welfare Legislative Oversight Panel
- Native American Legislative Liaison Committee
What they've said
140 remarks on 49 billsH.B. 401 Geothermal Study Amendments · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Explains that the amended bill directs Utah State University to study geological and environmental impacts of geothermal energy development, including seismic safety and development techniques, with a focus on sites at or near coal-powered generation facilities.
▶ Watch at 21:06Read what they said
Yes. This, uh, bill will be a little bit different now. It now directs Utah State University, uh, to conduct a study on the geological and environmental impacts of geothermal energy development in the state, including an examination of seismic safety and the impacts of different development techniques. It will also specifically examine impacts at or near coal powered electrical generation facility sites. And that is the change.
S.B. 254 Extracted Natural Resources Amendments · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Asks whether the sponsor knows the substitute would defund an air quality program in Uintah County by changing the infrastructure interest that funds it.
▶ Watch at 21:14Read what they said
Um, are you aware, um, that one of the things you're doing in this bill will totally defund the air quality program that's going on in Uintah County, Uh, that is not, uh, as part of this substitute and that's not an, uh, included in this substitute? One more question, Mr. Speaker by one more question. Mr. Speaker Representative, will you continue to yield?
S.B. 254 Extracted Natural Resources Amendments · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Asks whether the substitute would defund the air quality program in Uintah County, which is not included in the substitute.
▶ Watch at 21:14Read what they said
Um, are you aware, um, that one of the things you're doing in this bill will totally defund the air quality program that's going on in Uintah County, Uh, that is not, uh, as part of this substitute and that's not an, uh, included in this substitute?
S.B. 254 Extracted Natural Resources Amendments · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Says the substitute changes the infrastructure interest that funds the air quality program and states she will oppose the substitute due to air quality concerns in the Uinta Basin.
▶ Watch at 21:52Read what they said
In, in this substitute, there is a part where you, you are changing the infrastructure, uh, interest and that is where this program is funded from. Um, I just, I just want to say that we obviously have rural concerns because the Uinta Basin is one of the areas where we have to have attainment reached because of the industries there. So, uh, for that reason, um, I'm going to oppose this, um, substitute. Thank you Mr. Speaker
S.B. 254 Extracted Natural Resources Amendments · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Asks about changes to the infrastructure interest that funds the air quality program, citing Uinta Basin attainment concerns, and says she will oppose the substitute.
▶ Watch at 21:52Read what they said
In, in this substitute, there is a part where you, you are changing the infrastructure, uh, interest and that is where this program is funded from. Um, I just, I just want to say that we obviously have rural concerns because the Uinta Basin is one of the areas where we have to have attainment reached because of the industries there. So, uh, for that reason, um, I'm going to oppose this, um, substitute.
H.B. 401 Geothermal Study Amendments · Senate floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Describes H.B. 401 as a feasibility study of building geothermal energy facilities near existing coal-fired power plants, citing existing power line and substation infrastructure and base-load power, then opens the floor to questions and calls on Senator Hinkins.
▶ Watch at 1:10:25Read what they said
of Energy Development to conduct a study, a feasibility study to do geothermal energy facilities near existing coal fired power plants. And for the reason for that is that the infrastructure for the power lines and the substations are already there. And we have, uh, a base load, uh, energy with the geothermal. We have the units at the Glendale plant in Beaver County that's been operational for 60 or 70 years down there. And so it's a, a good clean energy and so we would, uh, would be able to use the existing infrastructure. And with that I'm open to questions. Thank you. Senator Hinkins.
S.B. 216 Higher Education Performance and Enrollment Funding · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Moves Amendment 5, which would require technical college funding formulas to include equivalent funding for secondary and adult students and reflect their statutorily required services.
▶ Watch at 1:13:30Read what they said
Thank you Mr. Speaker ProAm, I'd like to move, uh, amendment five in my name Motion is to adopt amendment number five. That's in order. Would you like to speak to it? Yes. On line 10, it says, it requires the higher education appropriation subcommittee to ensure the inclusion of certain factors in nons statutory funding formulas for technical colleges. And then on line 78, it says, and ensure that all nons statutory performance and growth funding formulas that contribute to appropriations for technical colleges include equivalent funding for secondary and adult students and reflect the full responsibility of the technical colleges, uh, statutorily required services. And so what this does is it, it was something that we worked on …
S.B. 209 Gooseberry Narrows State Park Study · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Watkins asks the sponsor to yield for a question.
▶ Watch at 1:45:03Read what they said
Thank you, Mr. Speaker Pro Tem. Um, may, may, will the sponsor yield to, uh, a question Representative Shelley, will you yield to a question?
S.B. 209 Gooseberry Narrows State Park Study · House floor debate (day 44) · Mar 5, 2026
Watkins reads from a 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers letter describing potential significant adverse effects on streams and wetlands and the expertise a study would require, and asks how that work can be done for $5,000.
▶ Watch at 1:45:32Read what they said
Hey, uh, Mr. Speaker, I'd like to, um, give my colleagues some, uh, information that I have. And I, uh, I have a letter here from the Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers out of Sacramento, dated May 27th, uh, 2016. And there's a lot of stuff in here, but I'd like to read just this one part that says, after review of the comments and concerns related to your application, and in response to the public notice for your proposed project, we have determined that development of the proposed project has the potential to cause significant adverse effects to the quality of the human environment. And your proposed project would result in direct impacts to approximately …
S.B. 124 Child Welfare Modifications · House floor debate (day 43) · Mar 4, 2026
Presents SB 124, which changes juvenile court warrant rules to separate custody and child safety warrants, adds entry protections, and raises required findings before DCFS action, and describes the cases behind the bill.
▶ Watch at 1:10:20Read what they said
Thank you Mr. Speaker. Um, uh, Mr. Speaker, this is, uh, a really tough bill to present to everyone. It's something that we have been dealing with as the child, uh, oversight Child welfare oversight panel for, um, several years. And it's, it's just been really, really difficult. And what this bill does is it, uh, amends, uh, provisions regarding, uh, warrants by a juvenile co court. It distinguishes between a, a productive custody and a child safety warrant. It also, whoops, I'm reading the wrong one, just said it also, uh, gotta get to the right one. It also adds prog, uh, protections regarding entry into a home during, uh, the execution of a child safety warrant. And it …
S.B. 124 Child Welfare Modifications · House floor debate (day 43) · Mar 4, 2026
Gives closing summation, saying the bill does not aim to take away parental rights, cites a recent Grand County case, and urges passage so the law can be tested and revised if needed.
▶ Watch at 1:30:11Read what they said
Thank you. Um, as I listen to the concerns, I take them very seriously. We've tried this before. We are not trying to take away parental rights. Um, as a mom, as a grandma, I absolutely, uh, don't believe in that. But we have a problem here in Utah. I don't know why. We just do. And we have too many people harming kids, keeping them away from everyone. And we're lucky because we have had people realize that something was wrong and, and reported them. We had one down in, uh, grand County in December. People noticed that the child was losing weight and then you start looking and there are marks on, on their wrists and on their …
S.B. 124 Child Welfare Modifications · House floor debate (day 43) · Mar 4, 2026
Gives summation in support, saying the bill is not about removing parental rights, citing a Grand County case, and suggesting the body try the bill and revisit it if it does not work.
▶ Watch at 1:30:11Read what they said
Thank you. Um, as I listen to the concerns, I take them very seriously. We've tried this before. We are not trying to take away parental rights. Um, as a mom, as a grandma, I absolutely, uh, don't believe in that. But we have a problem here in Utah. I don't know why. We just do. And we have too many people harming kids, keeping them away from everyone. And we're lucky because we have had people realize that something was wrong and, and reported them. We had one down in, uh, grand County in December. People noticed that the child was losing weight and then you start looking and there are marks on, on their wrists and on their …
S.B. 208 Vehicle Emission Inspection Program Revisions · House floor debate (day 43) · Mar 4, 2026
Asks which civil penalties the bill covers, specifically penalties for registering a vehicle to an invalid address or an address where the owner does not live.
▶ Watch at 2:20:11Read what they said
Would you say again, the penalties that they need to take care of If, if they're, um, given a civil penalty because they registered the car to a invalid address or an address that they don't live at. Okay. Thank you. That's all I needed. Thank you Mr. Speaker.
H.B. 2 New Fiscal Year Supplemental Appropriations · House floor debate (day 42) · Mar 3, 2026
Urges a vote against the motion to circle, saying the expenditure came through her committee and is worth funding.
▶ Watch at 39:40Read what they said
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I urge you to, um, vote against this, um, to be circled. This, um, expenditure came through my committee and, um, I think it's well worth it. And there's more than just one little thing that's involved in this. This has been an ongoing process and I think we need to, um, vote against this, uh, um, proposal. Thank you.
H.B. 468 Mobile Mammography Amendments · Senate Health and Human Services Committee · Mar 2, 2026
Presented HB 468 to require insurers to contract with the state's mobile mammography providers in third through sixth class counties, said there is no fiscal note, and said the bill does not add new services.
▶ Watch at 1:05:47Read what they said
Thank you. I too wanted to vote yay and nay when I would hear your voice saying things 'cause it just seems so familiar. But thank you. Um, this mobile ma mammography amendments bill deals with, um, uh, women who live in rural Utah. Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women, and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The evidence is clear. Early de detection through regular mammography saves lives, and it lowers overall healthcare costs. When screenings are delayed, cancers are found at later stages. When treatment is more intensive, outcomes are worse and the costs are significantly higher. So in Utah, women and live in living in rural communities are …
From the official recordings' automatic captions, with speakers and summaries identified by AI. Use the ▶ links to check the recording before you rely on a quote.